can someone give me the low down on roosters??

GeeChickens · Aug 4, 2015

We got 12 baby chicks in the spring. We are just now realizing that one of them is a rooster. I have been given a lot of conflicting info on roosters. My neighbor says the hens wont even lay unless there is a rooster but my husband and a friend say that the eggs are no good if you have a rooster because they will be fertilized. I just need to now which side of the argument is true, if either even is. Thank you!

bcAddy · Aug 4, 2015

Just like human females will ovulate without a male around

, so too will a hen lay without a rooster. And fertilized eggs are perfectly fine to eat as well.

Ridgerunner · Aug 4, 2015

Commercial egg laying operations have thousands of hens in their flocks and zero roosters. Many people on this forum have flocks with no roosters, especially people in city limits where roosters are not allowed, and get plenty of eggs without the added expense of feeding a rooster or breaking the law.

Since chickens were first domesticated and probably before people have been eating fertilized eggs. Since this country was settled practically every small farmer that had chickens had a rooster with their flock. The eggs they ate were fertilized. Unless the eggs are incubated you won’t know they are fertilized unless you know what to look for when you crack one open. Once you cook it you can’t tell.

The only reason you need a rooster is if you want fertilized eggs. Anything else is pure personal preference. I always recommend you keep as few roosters as you can and maintain your goals. That’s not because you are guaranteed problems with roosters, just that you can.

can someone give me the low down on roosters??

More options

GeeChickens

Hatching

bcAddy

In the Brooder

Ridgerunner

Enabler

Similar threads

New posts New threads Active threads

Latest posts

Latest threads

Threads with more replies in the last 15 days