Quote:
Originally Posted by
KristyHall 
I have felt that many dress code rules in our local schools have been some of the most pointless and arbitrary rules. I thought so as a student and I still feel such as a 29 year old woman.
Well I had the local news playing on my TV when I heard a spot on the local school district finally allowing boys to wear studded earrings, and that was after they had to be petitioned by a student expelled for the earrings.
While the rest of us have been living in the 21st century for 12 years, the local school board is finally creeping into the 20th century. Earrings on boys stopped being shocking by the early 90s.
As a teenager I was (luckily) never suspended for my open questioning of authority and of rules I found pointless. I helped other students understand their religious rights when over zealous administrators tried to prevent them from wearing religious symbols or long hair (native boys) while allowing other religious groups to wear their symbols of the same size.
Watching administrators pick and choose who they would enforce the rules with soured me on any sense of fairness. They calmed down in my school when a couple hundred students showed up wearing rainbow shirts in response to a boy being expelled for carrying a gay pride sign during a baseball game after the administrators made him remove his rainbow belt.
Styles and dress largely came about (at least in recent history ) to recognize differ net classes, religions, and creeds of people.
IMO, for one homogeneous group to force a strict (I emphasis strict since style changes with each generation and there is always an exception to any social rule) specific dress code upon a populace (men must wear x, women must wear z, and men can not wear z and women can not wear x) is little more than an unnecessary display of power in an attempt to force others to appeal to their own sense of taste.
Now I am not including dress that is dangerous, inflammatory (a shirt with racial slurs), and so on. I am speaking about the relatively harmless dress (Men with sparkly rainbow belts and women in suits)
What i find acceptable.
Males in dresses
Males with long hair
Males with earrings
Females in suits
Females with short hair
Religious apparel
Hats
Wigs
Males with make up
Females without make up
Ethnic apparel
I just don't see the reason for the controversy.
KristyHall, your very articulate writing suggests that whatever regime you endured at school did your education no harm at all. 
I'm generally in agreement with you but there must be limits on dress code. School uniforms cost money but fashion competition can cost more. Outrageous dress, body piercing, tattoos and hair fashion may be provocative or dangerous. Also, whilst I believe that education should be for the benefit of students' future lives in general, it must also prepare them for the expectations of future employers.
The problem is not whether a line between acceptable and unacceptable should be drawn but where it should be drawn. Fashion and taste change and young people want to experiment. If their parents don't perform their role effectively, then the schools must step in. Head Teachers have their own ideas that may be behind fashion but they also have to please the school authorities. Students will lead in fashion but how are the adults in authority over them supposed to know which new apparition will become generally acceptable? With the best will in the world, they will be behind the times and take a conservative view.
My Grammar School Headmaster belonged to an extreme religious sect and had very rigid ideas about dress code. That didn't stop him from looking down the girls' dresses though. The written rules said that boys must wear black shoes. He hated change and non-conformity so much that he had to add 'leather' when suede came into fashion, then round-toed (winkle pickers), then lace up (Chelsea boots). We laughed and complied, learning as we did how ridiculous was his attitude.
In one of my management jobs many years ago, a young employee complained to my HR manager that he was discriminated against because he was told to remove an earring. Earrings on men were not acceptable to our visiting corporate customers in those days. Without a word to me, the HR Manager called the Group HR Manager, a self-proclaimed feminist, for advice. She said that he could wear his earring. Then the young man's boss complained to me.
I called the Group HR Manager.
Me: Dot, what's this all about? Why are decisions being made without my involvement and for what reason do you change the standard office dress code?
Dot: We have to treat males and females equally. The young men in my local bank wear earrings.
Me: Dot, I don't care what goes on in your bank. I'm applying group rules here and you're changing them on a whim. The corporate visitors that keep us profitable down here would not be impressed by men wearing earrings in my office.
Dot: I'm not at all prejudiced, you know. For example, I believe that women should all wear stockings or tights at work.
A moment's pause while wonder what substance the woman is on.
Me: OK, Dot. Tomorrow, morning when the office opens, I will stand at the foot of the stairs and look up to see whether ............
The 'phone went dead before I could finish my sentence.
I called my boss. My instructions were taken from him, not HR or the cleaners. His response is not repeatable but the conclusion was that males were not allowed to wear earrings in my office!
Today, it would be very different, Probably no-one would even notice, including me.