Clearly you are only up for a fight which is not what this thread is about. In our country it is everyones business to make sure our dogs are well cared for in our society. That is why we have passed a law here on manditory microchipping. There are so many stray injured and abandoned dogs here right now many are destroyed because they have no way to contact the owners. Perhaps those owners were like you and didn;t want to take "full responsibility of the cost of caring for their dog!" I wonder what other fees you might not want to meet for your dog? Does your attitude include Vet fees? Spaying/neutering? Licence fees? Insurance costs?
If you didn;t want to meet the cost of having a dog maybe you shouldn't have got one!
I think there is a limit to caring for a pet... would you go into major financial debt to save a dog ? lose your home to a vet bill? eat dog food to save money for other unnecessary things for your dog? Everyone has their limits and judging other level of care beyond basic care is being a busybody. If I had to choose food for my family or food for my dog the dog would go but it would not disgrace the times and life it had.
"Guns don't kill people abortion kills people."
The human will is too powerful for philosophy or science.
Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton agreed on little publicly, but they did agree that when the public treasury becomes a public trough and the voters recognize that, they will send to government only those who promise them a bigger piece of the pie
"Guns don't kill people abortion kills people."
The human will is too powerful for philosophy or science.
Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton agreed on little publicly, but they did agree that when the public treasury becomes a public trough and the voters recognize that, they will send to government only those who promise them a bigger piece of the pie
