yeah, rabies would be a really bad thing.Thanks so much for setting my mind at ease! I agree, we had a opossum take one a few weeks back - just ate out the neck and left the rest - that one did NOT get eaten!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yeah, rabies would be a really bad thing.Thanks so much for setting my mind at ease! I agree, we had a opossum take one a few weeks back - just ate out the neck and left the rest - that one did NOT get eaten!
Grass has a lot to do with 'coloring' chickens, yes. It makes a visual difference in skin, crest/wattles etc, flesh, yolks, organs, everything.
The only real issue is in the animal having suffered for a long time.
Asides from the ethics issue, the biological/physiological reason is that any suffering, whether from oxygen deprivation or any other issue, causes lactic acid buildup in the flesh, which severely degrades it, and releases stress hormones which cause toxins to be released into the flesh from fats, organs etc over time, as well as a host of other health problems.
As with stressed/suffering humans, the longer they suffer, the worse their health gets. Things break down more and more and more the longer they're left in that state. Every process, even and one might say especially the immune system, is affected by suffering. Even after death the 'product' is unequal, as the mitochondria are exhausted; animals that suffered badly enough for long enough often do not even experience rigor mortis, and they rot in record time compared to an animal that suffered for a short time or not at all. They were already breaking down while alive.
That's why an animal having suffered prolonged stress will be higher acid and worse quality than one that didn't suffer long or at all, and thereby worse for your health. This is one reason bruised animals' meat is sold much cheaper or even rejected outright by butchers etc.
The emphasis is on 'prolonged' suffering --- if it only suffered a short time it's not going to degrade the whole body the way prolonged suffering does. It's not as great as a bird that didn't suffer but not as bad as one that suffered for a long time. Degrees of difference.
As I said before, it's unlikely to make you sick, but if you made a habit of eating animals that suffered for prolonged periods before being culled, it would gradually impact on your health too.
As you get more experienced with the differences in outcomes of good versus bad culls, you will be able to discern the taste in the ones that did not die well, and that's even in birds that only suffered for a short time. Growing and processing from home certainly educates the palate!
Best wishes.
Thank you for such an informative post!
I would say it is more likely from their differing feed than the suns rays