Great. Well here we go. Inspector guy is coming to take pics back to the office tomorrow. He has been nice and sympathetic, mostly because I get the sense he doesn't enjoy being the bad guy. That and wording in our city ordiances don't seem to ban chickens as it has been implied. I have searched and searched and was only to dig up the following:
(Under city board notes)
1) A reference made to changing the word "animals" under Property Code Maintenance Code Subsection (1) Keeping livestock, farm animals, domestic fowl, bees and other similar species of any kind. After a general discussion motion to send subsection (1) w/the ammendment to include exotic animals as well. The vote for the motion was unamimous. <- For the life of me, I cannot pull up anything under "property code maintenance".
(Under City Statutes)
2) Clarksville City Statute Section 3-104: Keeping in Such a Manner as to Become a Nuisance: No animal or fowl shall be kept in such a place or condition as to become a nuisance either because of noise, odor, contagious disease, or other causes.
Under County Animal Control
3) (j) Domestic animal includes dogs, cats, domesticated sheep, horses, cattle, goats, swine, fowl, ducks, geese, turkeys, confined domestic hares.
Definition according to County
4) AGRICULTURAL USE: This includes the growing of raising and maintenance of poultry and other livestock, horticulture, viticulture, floriculture, forests and timber, and any processing of products raised on the premises. Commercial feed lots, the raising of furbearing animals, riding academy,livery or boarding stables or dog kennels are not considered to be normal agricultural uses.
County Permitted Principal and Accessory Uses and Structures
5) Agriculture uses and their accessory structures as defined in Article II, provided that no buildings to be used for the keeping of poultry or farm livestock shall be located closer to any property line or dwelling than two hundred (200) feet.
___________
So when push comes to shove, who wins? County or City laws?? Or even when county laws conflict? (Who says fowl is domestic or agricultural?)
(Under city board notes)
1) A reference made to changing the word "animals" under Property Code Maintenance Code Subsection (1) Keeping livestock, farm animals, domestic fowl, bees and other similar species of any kind. After a general discussion motion to send subsection (1) w/the ammendment to include exotic animals as well. The vote for the motion was unamimous. <- For the life of me, I cannot pull up anything under "property code maintenance".
(Under City Statutes)
2) Clarksville City Statute Section 3-104: Keeping in Such a Manner as to Become a Nuisance: No animal or fowl shall be kept in such a place or condition as to become a nuisance either because of noise, odor, contagious disease, or other causes.
Under County Animal Control
3) (j) Domestic animal includes dogs, cats, domesticated sheep, horses, cattle, goats, swine, fowl, ducks, geese, turkeys, confined domestic hares.
Definition according to County
4) AGRICULTURAL USE: This includes the growing of raising and maintenance of poultry and other livestock, horticulture, viticulture, floriculture, forests and timber, and any processing of products raised on the premises. Commercial feed lots, the raising of furbearing animals, riding academy,livery or boarding stables or dog kennels are not considered to be normal agricultural uses.
County Permitted Principal and Accessory Uses and Structures
5) Agriculture uses and their accessory structures as defined in Article II, provided that no buildings to be used for the keeping of poultry or farm livestock shall be located closer to any property line or dwelling than two hundred (200) feet.
___________
So when push comes to shove, who wins? County or City laws?? Or even when county laws conflict? (Who says fowl is domestic or agricultural?)
Last edited: