Search results for query: *

Soooo... why don't you just give me 50% of $100,000 then if it's not anywhere near a statistically significant amount? Herds, eggs, broilers all are raised commercially on averages. 2% to 3% less money is a significant amount in the real world of farm incomes. Possibly not in the ethereal world...

Again...50%+ difference. And throwing in that last bit about "the wide variability in individual counts failed to indicate a statistically significant difference" sounds straight from an ad mans dialog. You raise a herd by numbers and pounds and averages....50% less count "average" in this case...

I'm not so sure about either of those test (pdf's posted). First one considers 50% worm load less at the end of the test then the control group...not significant..?? Second test is using 0 to 10 week old lambs with little worm load tests...weight/blood counts only ...lambs with the ewes...