- Feb 24, 2012
- 16
- 1
- 24
Now I've been reading about pheasants and have discovered quite a bit of negativity regarding hybridization. I have some questions that didn't quite get covered in the old thread I read that was from a few years ago. Feel free to answer as many or as few as you like.
Presuming that the breeder is interested in preserving a rare/endangered species like the Edward's, Lophura edwardsi...
1. Who determines what constitutes "pure"? Even in the wild there are variants and subspecies and natural hybrid populations of many species.
2. Won't the artificial selection of being in captivity for generations select for traits that may make reintroduction in the case of an extinction event unlikely? Alpine species raised at sea level, or unconscious selection for docile temperament...
3. At what point is a bloodline too pure? When you limit the gene pool you increase the likelihood that every individual will be susceptible to infectious disease beyond the issue of negative traits.
4. In a case of severely limited gene pool, is it preferable to breed unsuitable specimens or outcross to a closely related species?
Presuming a breeder creating hybrids or crosses...
5. Why? There are numerous beautiful species that need to be preserved... Is it for looks, vigor, or the drive to tinker?
6. How do you ensure you don't introduce genes in pure bloods, or do you care?
7. I have heard implications that people who pass off crosses are in it for the cash... how is it more profitable than simply breeding true? One half or more of your parent stock will still need to be the more expensive species and I imagine the loss of specimens that can't pass as pure would negate any savings from parent stock.
General...
8. What are the implications for the notion of species when fertile crosses are so common?
9. Why is it considered acceptable to breed in other chicken breeds to acquire a trait and not pheasants. It seems to me that at least some species could be considered semi-domestic and already have mutations that are bred for. Where is the line crossed exactly?
10. Why are there not studbooks or registries or at least documentation of some sort? It seems that would solve a lot of issues for both sides.
I can see both sides in a way but some of the reasons I read left me with more questions. Please converse in a civil manor, I know its a bit of a hot topic in some circles.
Presuming that the breeder is interested in preserving a rare/endangered species like the Edward's, Lophura edwardsi...
1. Who determines what constitutes "pure"? Even in the wild there are variants and subspecies and natural hybrid populations of many species.
2. Won't the artificial selection of being in captivity for generations select for traits that may make reintroduction in the case of an extinction event unlikely? Alpine species raised at sea level, or unconscious selection for docile temperament...
3. At what point is a bloodline too pure? When you limit the gene pool you increase the likelihood that every individual will be susceptible to infectious disease beyond the issue of negative traits.
4. In a case of severely limited gene pool, is it preferable to breed unsuitable specimens or outcross to a closely related species?
Presuming a breeder creating hybrids or crosses...
5. Why? There are numerous beautiful species that need to be preserved... Is it for looks, vigor, or the drive to tinker?
6. How do you ensure you don't introduce genes in pure bloods, or do you care?
7. I have heard implications that people who pass off crosses are in it for the cash... how is it more profitable than simply breeding true? One half or more of your parent stock will still need to be the more expensive species and I imagine the loss of specimens that can't pass as pure would negate any savings from parent stock.
General...
8. What are the implications for the notion of species when fertile crosses are so common?
9. Why is it considered acceptable to breed in other chicken breeds to acquire a trait and not pheasants. It seems to me that at least some species could be considered semi-domestic and already have mutations that are bred for. Where is the line crossed exactly?
10. Why are there not studbooks or registries or at least documentation of some sort? It seems that would solve a lot of issues for both sides.
I can see both sides in a way but some of the reasons I read left me with more questions. Please converse in a civil manor, I know its a bit of a hot topic in some circles.