Search results for query: *

I think a bigger point that's often missed is that there's very little evidence that organic foods are better for you. There's this belief that the organic foods in the grocery store are grown on quaint little farms that use chickens for pest control, don't spray any pesticides, and are...

Good for you - but this thread is about Purina chicken food, not the raw meat diet in dogs. If you want to serve your chickens raw meat, great. Do that - it's better for them. Most of us don't have time for that (other than occasional scraps) and prefer to feed a balanced, complete...

Then you should be able to link to such study - as I can't seem to find it, via google or any of the normal venues. In fact, the only study I can find referencing ethoxyquin and sterility is this on: http://jn.nutrition.org/content/91/2/219.full.pdf...

If you're reading cancer studies about Round-Up or GMOs with scary numbers, they're most certainly not independent. The only scary ones are coming out of Seralini, and he's a fraud. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%A9ralini_affair This is the single largest feeding study done on pretty much...

Most food preservatives are pesticides - the entire purpose is to retard bacteria and fungal growth in food. Vinegar is a pesticide. Citric acid is a pesticide. Salt is a pesticide.

He's not being ugly - you're posting the opinions of a man (as fact) who has consistently been reprimanded by every medical association in this country for putting patients at risk. You're quoting a man who has made claims rediculous enough to get censured by the FDA over dietary supplements -...

Mercola is a quack. Ethoxyquin is a fat stabilizer. It keeps food from going rancid. There are no clinical links to cancer. Here's a link to an article on the FDA telling Mercola he needs to stop making things up: http://www.quackwatch.com/11Ind/mercola.html