Vivid Hatchery
Chirping
Hello everyone,
I am a chicken farmer, so I read across someone recommending sprouted fodder in a thread. So, I thought I would do some research. I found a scientific article that analyzes the economic and nutritional differences between commercial and small scale, price of feed vs growing, and the nutritional properties of the two, the seed and the sprouts.
In a nutshell, it is not economical. All of the costs that go into it, including labor and materials, electricity, etc, do not counter balance the benefit. Additionally, the article states that until day 10 - 14, there is no nutritional benefit. It states that the plant is absorbing the starch in order to transform to become the plant, and absorbing the nutrients in the process.
The article states, that the only people who would benefit from this, are people who are trying to be independent, and people who do not have access to the grains locally. There is also added benefit in giving the animals you have something more palatable, because it is filled with water, and this can be desirable for the animals who get very specific basic feed, and that they will likely enjoy it more. But once again, not profitable, not cost effective, not more nutritious.
I had no position either way prior to reading the article. What I have read before this were claims by people who were not peer reviewed academics, so for now I am going to put my faith here until something equally scientific and peer reviewed disputes it.
Here is the article. I read all of it, but I did not read much of the comments. It appeared from the first few comments that the author was engaged, so if you have questions or concerns about it, that would be the first place I would go.
http://ucanr.edu/blogs/blogcore/postdetail.cfm?postnum=11721
I am a chicken farmer, so I read across someone recommending sprouted fodder in a thread. So, I thought I would do some research. I found a scientific article that analyzes the economic and nutritional differences between commercial and small scale, price of feed vs growing, and the nutritional properties of the two, the seed and the sprouts.
In a nutshell, it is not economical. All of the costs that go into it, including labor and materials, electricity, etc, do not counter balance the benefit. Additionally, the article states that until day 10 - 14, there is no nutritional benefit. It states that the plant is absorbing the starch in order to transform to become the plant, and absorbing the nutrients in the process.
The article states, that the only people who would benefit from this, are people who are trying to be independent, and people who do not have access to the grains locally. There is also added benefit in giving the animals you have something more palatable, because it is filled with water, and this can be desirable for the animals who get very specific basic feed, and that they will likely enjoy it more. But once again, not profitable, not cost effective, not more nutritious.
I had no position either way prior to reading the article. What I have read before this were claims by people who were not peer reviewed academics, so for now I am going to put my faith here until something equally scientific and peer reviewed disputes it.
Here is the article. I read all of it, but I did not read much of the comments. It appeared from the first few comments that the author was engaged, so if you have questions or concerns about it, that would be the first place I would go.
http://ucanr.edu/blogs/blogcore/postdetail.cfm?postnum=11721