If you notice too "they" (the NH people) didn't tarry too long here(on the subject) when asked about the colors(correct colors) and how to go about getting what they had established the correct colors to be? Never seen nor heard of them since then. "They" must have realized; 'man I have fell right into the middle of a bunch of dunces or bumbling idiots' LOL < though I'm not insinuating any here are>J/SThere is eight feather colors on the NH, and an under color.
redish bay
golden bay
deep chestnut red
brilliant deep chestnut red
medium chestnut red
black
red
medium red
light salmon
Four other than feather colors.
red
reddish horn
reddish bay
yellow
The main color of the NH, obviously, is chestnut red in varying shades. Chestnut red is described as a dark-red brown plumage color in the Standard glossary. Notice the word(s) dark, and red-brown.
The Standard seams full of old agricultural color descriptions. A lot of people today have not seen a chestnut. Chestnut trees used to be common. If you googled chestnuts, you will find there is a natural variation from nut to nut and from tree to tree. Overall the average color is pretty clear, and it is not a particularly light color.
It is my opinion that the color in the Standard picture is too light. The explanation has been that the NH is a meat bird and should be a lighter color. I disagree on this point, because the Standard differentiates between the especially light meat strain NHs and the Standard dual purpose NH. I am also of the opinion that how a bird dresses out is as much about the under color as the outer color. The under color being a light salmon, they dress out relatively clean.
The conclusion that I have come to is that one side has swung one way, and the other swung the other way. I hope to "brighten" up my NHs a bit, but have no intentions of trying to go as far as the Standard picture. If that will not be in keeping with what many judges have come to understand as correct, then so be it. My efforts will be as I see it.
The debate on the NH color is not new. I have seen literature discussing/debating this before. This is not the first German import either. Seams some were floating around sometime in the 80s. I think that is also noteworthy that this debate has been had in Europe as well. There is more than one side on this issue in Germany.
To me it is easier to follow my interpretation of the Standard description, instead of the picture or accepted opinions. From there I have come to my own conclusions. I do like the Schilling print however.
What I have found with these birds from Germany is that they have been well bred. They are quite remarkable birds. To be as finely bred as they are, the hatch ability and livability is solid. The lay rate is pretty good etc. Easy to manage, and gorgeous to see on range. My opinion is that they are the best we have. I thought it was interesting to see them dismissed by the NH people here. Even if someone does not like the color, there is more to them than color. That is the last thing I look at, when I look at a bird. Maybe it is a guy thing, but thankfully there is more to a bird than color. Especially when you start debating shades of color.
Jeff