Bumblefoot?

Wash off the Blu-kote, set up a good light and take another photo of the growth so we can see a better lighted photo with more detail. You are seeing this thing in 3D and you are assuming we can see what you see. In two dimensions, which is flat, we are unable to identify certain aspects that we would be able to if we could see the contours you are able to see. In addition to a new photo, you need to think up all the words you can to describe it, as if you are describing it to a blind person. This is the way you need to convey information over the internet to get us to visualize the problem so we can help.

An injury, a cancer tumor, a gout swelling, an abscess, a bumblefoot lesion all have subtle differences that don't easily show up in a quick snapshot. You need to use words to describe it. A common cancer tumor on chickens may look kind of like bumblefoot, but it's larger and flatter and has a scabby center. Other cancers are rock hard. An abscess may look like a big blister, but it's soft, not rock hard. Only words can give us that information. If the thing has a smell, a photo can't tell us that, only words can.

Do you get the idea here?
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom