I called a lot of local vets a few years ago, trying to find someone who would decrow my rooster. I got a lot of judgement from the nurses who took my phone call. Most of them told me in a very condescending manner that it was cruel. I don't think it cruel at all. Many humans go in for very painful, elective surgery just to correct their appearance. The only thing cruel about it is the fact that the rooster doesn't have a choice in the matter. But I'm 99.9999% sure that if the rooster could talk and I could ask him if he would rather have decrowing surgery or have his head chopped off, his feathers plucked, his guts cut out and his flesh grilled over red hot charcoal and then chewed and digested by an upper primate, that he would most definitely choose to have the surgery. To those judgmental people I ask, if you had cancer and having surgery would save your life, wouldn't you have the surgery?
I can understand vets thinking that the old methods of decrowing were cruel and inhumane. I think it's clear they were/are. The method that Dr James is talking about is NEW and not at all the same type of thing. From what I understand, he makes slits in the noise-making apparatus such that it no longer holds air and thus can't make the loud sounds. So while this is invasive surgery, it doesn't entail the kind of pain and suffering that older methods have. This is also unlike dog debarking in terms of method and side-effects as the sound-making apparatus is not the same. I'm far from a fan of meddling with our animal companions, but I am a great proponent of spay/neuter, so obviously I think that there are interventions that are appropriate.