Cetawin
Rest in Peace 1963-2021
That case is a landmark case based on the
The Humane Methods of Slaughter Act (HMSA) which explicitly requires that "cattle, calves, horses, mules, sheep, swine, and other livestock" be slaughtered in accordance with humane methods.
Despite the fact that "other livestock" clearly includes animals such as farmed birds, who comprise more than nine out of ten land farm animals killed annually in this country, the USDA interprets this law in a way that excludes chickens, turkeys, and other birds from legal protection. So the Humane Society and various animal rights organizations filed the suit to attack the USDA basically and get the same killing treatment for cows applied to chickens, turkeys and etc.
United States District Court Judge Marilyn Hall Patel refused to dismiss the case on September 6, 2006. And it went back to be heard. It has yet to be resolved or determined that chickens are or are not livestock on a Federal level and that still resides with state and local laws to specify.
Some states such as California specifically address "Poultry" in their agricultural laws.
The problem that changing the HMSA creates is that once chickens are defined as "livestock" which is what that lawsuit is seeking, urban and many backyard chickens keepers will be in violation of agricultural laws for keeping "livestock".
If no changes is made and chickens are NOT defined as livestock, they can be killed by the billions each year in any manner of cruelty the owners wish, urban and backyard flock owners will still have to deal with code enforcement if violating local laws.
It will be interesting to see what happens when this suit is finalized. I just hope she can deal with these local code enforcers and get a variance or something to protect her hens.
The Humane Methods of Slaughter Act (HMSA) which explicitly requires that "cattle, calves, horses, mules, sheep, swine, and other livestock" be slaughtered in accordance with humane methods.
Despite the fact that "other livestock" clearly includes animals such as farmed birds, who comprise more than nine out of ten land farm animals killed annually in this country, the USDA interprets this law in a way that excludes chickens, turkeys, and other birds from legal protection. So the Humane Society and various animal rights organizations filed the suit to attack the USDA basically and get the same killing treatment for cows applied to chickens, turkeys and etc.
United States District Court Judge Marilyn Hall Patel refused to dismiss the case on September 6, 2006. And it went back to be heard. It has yet to be resolved or determined that chickens are or are not livestock on a Federal level and that still resides with state and local laws to specify.
Some states such as California specifically address "Poultry" in their agricultural laws.
The problem that changing the HMSA creates is that once chickens are defined as "livestock" which is what that lawsuit is seeking, urban and many backyard chickens keepers will be in violation of agricultural laws for keeping "livestock".
If no changes is made and chickens are NOT defined as livestock, they can be killed by the billions each year in any manner of cruelty the owners wish, urban and backyard flock owners will still have to deal with code enforcement if violating local laws.
It will be interesting to see what happens when this suit is finalized. I just hope she can deal with these local code enforcers and get a variance or something to protect her hens.
Last edited: