PearlD wrote:
she is loved..........
she is loved..........
By whom? If she were loved by her family she would not be alone and she would not be behaving this way unchecked.
Why, by God, of course! And should be loved by God's children as a matter of course. Yes, she may be difficult to love but she still deserves some help and understanding. If the family won't step up, then there are agencies that will see she gets medical care. C,mon, folks, this is a family and husband in extreme denial...that is something you can't fix, but you can appeal to the proper authorities that have been put in place to help people like this.
Why, by God, of course! And should be loved by God's children as a matter of course. Yes, she may be difficult to love but she still deserves some help and understanding. If the family won't step up, then there are agencies that will see she gets medical care. C,mon, folks, this is a family and husband in extreme denial...that is something you can't fix, but you can appeal to the proper authorities that have been put in place to help people like this.
by your own admission, the kids did trespass on her property. in the eyes of the law, ignorance is no excuse. i am not saying that the old lady is not crazy or not acting unreasonable but just letting you know that once the authorities get involved the process will be followed exactly to the letter of the law and you and your kids are just as likely to get in trouble as her.
i can hear the defacs case worker now... "just who was watching the kids while they trespassed?" "did YOU see her swerve at them?" "NO?" "was there no adult supervision while they were outside?" "i think we may just have to take these kids into protective custody until we can figure out if you are providing a safe environment for them!" don't believe it can happen like this? i saw it happen to my friends brother. be very careful when you start calling anyone involved in child protection. that deal can go south if you get a "just as crazy as the ol bat next door" case worker.
I would have to agree with this! Sometimes whistle blowers get entrapped in their own snares. BUT, if one approached this in a concerned and compassionate manner, it is more likely that someone will respect an objective viewpoint as opposed to an emotional, upset parent.
I think the OP has done a pretty good job, but I would also advise for setting some limits on the children's wandering. When I was young, everyone KNEW to stay out of old man Cochran's yard!
Not too young to use this as a lesson in respecting other's property, and the right to peace and quiet in their neighborhood.
i can hear the defacs case worker now... "just who was watching the kids while they trespassed?" "did YOU see her swerve at them?" "NO?" "was there no adult supervision while they were outside?" "i think we may just have to take these kids into protective custody until we can figure out if you are providing a safe environment for them!" don't believe it can happen like this? i saw it happen to my friends brother. be very careful when you start calling anyone involved in child protection. that deal can go south if you get a "just as crazy as the ol bat next door" case worker.
I would have to agree with this! Sometimes whistle blowers get entrapped in their own snares. BUT, if one approached this in a concerned and compassionate manner, it is more likely that someone will respect an objective viewpoint as opposed to an emotional, upset parent.
I think the OP has done a pretty good job, but I would also advise for setting some limits on the children's wandering. When I was young, everyone KNEW to stay out of old man Cochran's yard!