Thank you so much! I thought that was the case but I just wasn't sure enough to advise it. When in doubt, err on the side of caution, so that's just what I did. You clarified it beautifully.FYI the courts have a long standing precedent that if it's in public view it's AOK to film and is protected under the 1st amendment... So unless said camera is using 'extraordinary means' to film an area where one has the presumption of privacy is expected it's legal, even if that means it's aimed directly at her yard, as her yard is not a place where one would have a presumption of privacy in most cases unless it was fully enclosed and had a roof over it... For example aiming it directly at her bedroom/bathroom window with a telephoto night vision lens would likely be deemed 'extraordinary means' to view an area where there is an expectation of privacy and be illegal... On the other hand having a camera aimed at her property would generally not be illegal in most cases, as there is generally no presumption of privacy when you are walking around outside in the open especially if you (the neighbor) can clearly see the area from your property... This is why paparazzi's can for all intents take all the pictures they want without breaking he law, even if that means following a person down the sidewalk at arms length or putting a camera up on the sidewalk right in front of someones house as many news reporters do...