The T. Rex in our Back Gardens

LucyMatilda15

In the Brooder
Oct 3, 2015
24
3
31
Brisbane, Australia
Hello everyone!

If you're into Dinosaurs like I am, then chances are you've probably already heard this story already. A few years ago, a scientist was working on the leg bone of a 66 million year old Tyrannosaurus Rex thigh bone, when they discovered and isolated some fragments of DNA building-blocks that was still preserved deep in the fossil bone.

They ran a DNA marker test and compared it with several living modern day animals ranging from birds to reptiles to amphibians. And the results were astounding! They not only positively identified that birds shared the closest ancestry match, but they were also able to pin-point a specific type of descendant bird-and it was the humble Chicken!

Now how a 12 meter long by 7 meter high carnivorous Dinosaur got down to the size of the Chicken I have no idea-but it's good food for thought.

And speaking of thoughts-feel free to share yours about this intriguing topic
smile.png
 
YAAASSSS ANOTHER DINO NERD HERE!!! I actually saw that paleontologist talk at the Burke Museum in Seattle last year, and some of her views do conflict mine.

Also, my views are that maybe our chickens are descendants of smaller theropods, and that T. Rex was close to that animal.

I had a chicken named T. Rex. She fell to the dawn of the mammals when she got eaten by raccoons.
 
YAAASSSS ANOTHER DINO NERD HERE!!! I actually saw that paleontologist talk at the Burke Museum in Seattle last year, and some of her views do conflict mine.

Also, my views are that maybe our chickens are descendants of smaller theropods, and that T. Rex was close to that animal.

I had a chicken named T. Rex. She fell to the dawn of the mammals when she got eaten by raccoons.
Oh I'm sorry to hear about your loss. But yes, there is some interesting stuff going on in the Paleontology world. Now there is the biggest argument about whether or not T Rex had a downy coat of feathers, and a new view on how Spinosaurus stood/walked.
 
The thing is though, I don't think they are. There are certainly views that I find to be... prehistoric in a sense, but feathery dinosaurs are absolutely a fact. I'm on the feathery side!
 
Last edited:
Imagine how upset they would be if they discovered they were wrong about all their major proclamations
lau.gif
Like how they missed the whole part where chickens are chickens and have always been chickens and are not connected to anything else...except chickens?
Hope I read that right drumstick. I think we're both saying they're wrong
wink.png
Chickens are chickens and dinos are dinos
old.gif
 
Last edited:
lau.gif
Like how they missed the whole part where chickens are chickens and have always been chickens and are not connected to anything else...except chickens?
Hope I read that right drumstick. I think we're both saying they're wrong
wink.png
Chickens are chickens and dinos are dinos
old.gif

Yeah some Paleontologists reckon that chickens descended from Dromaeosaurids (Raptors), but they've got the wrong pelvis shapes. Raptors were lizard-hipped, while chickens are bird-hipped so I don't know. Also sorry for the Paleo-jargon, I'm a bit of a nerd when it comes to Dinosaurs and stuff.
lol.png
 
Well since Jurassic park is truth
1f61c.png
look how the raptors run vs how our chickens run.

I think we know who try animation/animatronics people based them off of ;)

T. rex didn't rawr. He b-kaw'd.

;)
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom