- Apr 19, 2009
- 4,203
- 168
- 253
The way poultry standards are written, genetic heritage is not a requirement for a bird to be accepted as a breed -- or, at least, that's what's continually echoed here. There are poultry breeds which have varieties listed under them, even though the varieties themselves had different genetic origins (Rhode Island Red vs Rhode Island White, for example). They are considered the same breed because they can breed true to the same conformation, despite the fact that each arose independently from one another. There is a breed of turkey today that was formerly extinct, but was revived by combining other breeds which had the necessary color genes to recombine to form the color conformation in the extinct breed's SOP -- ironically, also a Buff (Jersey Buffs). They can be shown as the same breed, even though it is clear that today's birds are not descended from the birds in the original population. If they fit the physical description and can breed true, they're in.
Correct. That's what I was getting at when I said, "Regardless, when it comes to poultry, adherence to a breed is based on appearance and ability to reproduce true to the breed." This is because there are no registries in poultry, genetic heritage is not tracked. That doesn't mean it's not important though, especially with rare breeds; it comes down to genetic preservation and that's enough fodder for a whole 'nother thread.
OOOOH!
Thanks, you rock!
I know I'm weird, but genetics and breeding to me is pretty interesting and exciting.
This is the thread I was thinking of. Rather than regurgitating, you can just go read there. I still say those geese are just buffs, but time will tell.
In another discussion Pete55 said that if you cross a lav gander over a buff female you will get 100% blue offspring with the males split for buff.