@WI chickens the only drawback is 20% reduction in size. Also materials efficiency is very minimal - one can buy 10' 2" x 4" stock and 4' x 8' sheets can be cut in half. The extra 20% in size would certainly be less than 20% increase in cost.
I did my 10' by 16' Woods using only rough cut lumber of 2" x 3" by 10' and 1" x 6" by 10'; very minimal waste. Cost today in my area would be around $2k.
I have fox (and many other predators) that are daytime hunters; also have mites from wild birds. Hence no free ranging. Clearly depends on one's local conditions. AI does worry me given explosion this year.
I did my 10' by 16' Woods using only rough cut lumber of 2" x 3" by 10' and 1" x 6" by 10'; very minimal waste. Cost today in my area would be around $2k.
I have fox (and many other predators) that are daytime hunters; also have mites from wild birds. Hence no free ranging. Clearly depends on one's local conditions. AI does worry me given explosion this year.