- Thread starter
- #11
I am sure there are some who won't consider Spinosad "natural" enough. My major reasons for being interested in Spinosad is that it is a newer class of pesticide, so it means that there is less chance of pests being resistant (at least for a few more years until they develop resistance to this) and there are studies that show that it is effective and relatively safe.Of course it is, but thats very different than the egg being made of "synthetic chemicals" - which spinosad is.
I think most of the organic movement is a whole bunch of silly based on the naturalism fallacy.
Certainly not all of those products that I referenced above are organic, but the Mother Earth article seemed to draw a distinction between permethrines that are synthesized forms of a natural chemical and "organic" Spinosad. To clarify it in my mind, I checked Wikipedia:
"Spinosad is a novel mode-of-action insecticide derived from a family of natural products obtained by fermentation of S. spinosa. Spinosyns occur in over 20 natural forms, and over 200 synthetic forms (spinosoids) have been produced in the lab.[4] Spinosad contains a mix of two spinosoids, spinosyn A, the major component, and spinosyn D (the minor component), in an approximately 17:3 ratio.[1]"
So it does sound like the products that are considered organic are produced through fermentation, but a lot of the others are synthetic. I do like that I can at least suggest an 'Organic Approved" option for poor infested chickens who have only been dusted with DE.