- Thread starter
- #31
And it would still be a rough estimate at best. The soil it is grown in makes a huge difference also, and climate including variations in the same year - micro climates or differences from year to year or whether it was planted earlier or later than the same variety in the next field. Whether it was harvested at peak nutrition, sometimes how it was harvested, if it was dried correctly, how it was stored, I'm sure there are more.... oh, yeah, like what other plants are in the field.Anyone trying to work out the percentages for themselves would presumably have to use a generic figure for e.g. 'corn' though, so we'd need to know which variety of corn was tested to produce the generic figure wouldn't we?
Thankfully, most nutrients have a pretty wide window between deficiency and toxicity in most species. Unfortunately, not all species do for every nutrient. If you are pushing the limits of things like production or living conditions, or your population is big enough, than the window to see a difference is narrower.
Even if it would be a rough estimate without testing, I think it is worth paying attention to for our birds and other animals because often a limiting factor for health or growth is how much they can eat. If ingredients have more nutrients per volume or weight, one has more options to get other nutrients to optimal levels.