- Jun 6, 2013
- 497
- 129
- 181
Forgive me if this has been addressed; I'm sure it has. There's a lot of very long posts and endless threads with similar questions I've browsed but have not found what I'm looking for.
What differentiates 'scratch' from 'feed' if the protein content is the same? Everyone talks in terms of protein. Percentage of protein in the feed. But what about nutrition? Actual nutrition; vitamins, minerals, bacterias? Why are layer pellets, at 17% protein, containing processed, cooked grain byproduct, wheat, corn, and soy, somehow better than a 17% whole-grain scratch of the same raw ingredients?
Backstory of how I'm feeding and why I'm asking, not a mandatory read in relation to the question:
I've shied away from bagged feed in the last year. The less big-box feed I fed, the less health issues I had in the birds, that much was apparent. I progressed from big-brand feeds to a local brand starter and feed in the spring/summer. It is cheaper but I didn't notice much change in the birds, and my April 2014 chicks still weren't laying come fall. I tried formulating my own mix over the winter but it was too costly.
In January I decided to try a local feed of ground (but whole, unprocessed) non-gmo corn, wheat, and peas at 17% protein mix. I've been feeding this for about 6 weeks. I soak overnight and feed a hydrated slop once or twice a day. They're a healthy weight, laying, and seem happy. One little girl in particular, a factory rescue, had gone almost 2 years without molting and looked absolutely horrid (she was in this state when I picked her up; skeletal feathers, bald in places, and complaining all the time). Within 3 weeks of this new feed she molted almost overnight and looks fabulous now. Their yolks are a rich "Home Depot Orange" as I like to call it, unlike a tasteless pale yellow when feeding big-box feed. Overall I'm happy with it, and at $19/100lb it's the best deal i've found yet, I'm getting eggs, feathers are shiny, birds are happy. But this mix might be considered 'scratch', which has me thinkin'...
What differentiates 'scratch' from 'feed' if the protein content is the same? Everyone talks in terms of protein. Percentage of protein in the feed. But what about nutrition? Actual nutrition; vitamins, minerals, bacterias? Why are layer pellets, at 17% protein, containing processed, cooked grain byproduct, wheat, corn, and soy, somehow better than a 17% whole-grain scratch of the same raw ingredients?
Backstory of how I'm feeding and why I'm asking, not a mandatory read in relation to the question:
I've shied away from bagged feed in the last year. The less big-box feed I fed, the less health issues I had in the birds, that much was apparent. I progressed from big-brand feeds to a local brand starter and feed in the spring/summer. It is cheaper but I didn't notice much change in the birds, and my April 2014 chicks still weren't laying come fall. I tried formulating my own mix over the winter but it was too costly.
In January I decided to try a local feed of ground (but whole, unprocessed) non-gmo corn, wheat, and peas at 17% protein mix. I've been feeding this for about 6 weeks. I soak overnight and feed a hydrated slop once or twice a day. They're a healthy weight, laying, and seem happy. One little girl in particular, a factory rescue, had gone almost 2 years without molting and looked absolutely horrid (she was in this state when I picked her up; skeletal feathers, bald in places, and complaining all the time). Within 3 weeks of this new feed she molted almost overnight and looks fabulous now. Their yolks are a rich "Home Depot Orange" as I like to call it, unlike a tasteless pale yellow when feeding big-box feed. Overall I'm happy with it, and at $19/100lb it's the best deal i've found yet, I'm getting eggs, feathers are shiny, birds are happy. But this mix might be considered 'scratch', which has me thinkin'...