Sorry, I can't concede on that one. I will agree that there are similarities, and could be used to occupy similar roles. One is longer than the other etc. The SOP does not go into great enough detail to fully describe what a bird is, and I will not even concider what is shown.
There is enough in the SOP to see the difference though. That is the written section. The NH is described as medium in length, and the Australorp moderately long. The NH neck is medium in length, and the Australorp is moderately long. This medium everything NH's weight comes from it's width. It should be a slightly wider bird.
One is a dual purpouse bird with an emphasis on egg laying. The other is a dual purpouse bird with an emphasis on putting meat on at an early age. This is reflected in the difference of body type.
If you buy Rhode Island Reds from Ideal and grow them out, you will see a particular tendency. (I am not speaking of their production reds, but their darks.) The faster maturing birds (or the ones with greater weight at younger ages) tend to be the shorter wider birds. That is not with out exception ofcourse. That is how the NH got it's shape. Pushing for that weight at young ages and speed of maturity. The longer and taller a bird is, the more frame it has to build. Or bone to grow out. This broad bird without the capacity of a longer bird is the reason for their historic reputation as average to good layers. The extra length of the Australorp is the opposite. Both had egg laying strains that did really well, so this isn't the best point, but you see what I am trying to say.
I am sure their is fault with what I have said. I see better than I say. My point is intended to be cosistant with my opinion that they do have slightly different body types, because the emphasis of the two are different. Close, but different. The closest bird to the NH in the SOP is the Delaware, the biggest difference being length and color.
Now what they have evolved to be? That is another subject.
I will continue to agree that there are similarities, and even in their development.
I hope this isn't taken as a negative. I enjoy reading your posts and thread. I have learned a lot. I guess that you can figure something like this coming from a NH enthusiast.
Where do I insert the smilies?
There is enough in the SOP to see the difference though. That is the written section. The NH is described as medium in length, and the Australorp moderately long. The NH neck is medium in length, and the Australorp is moderately long. This medium everything NH's weight comes from it's width. It should be a slightly wider bird.
One is a dual purpouse bird with an emphasis on egg laying. The other is a dual purpouse bird with an emphasis on putting meat on at an early age. This is reflected in the difference of body type.
If you buy Rhode Island Reds from Ideal and grow them out, you will see a particular tendency. (I am not speaking of their production reds, but their darks.) The faster maturing birds (or the ones with greater weight at younger ages) tend to be the shorter wider birds. That is not with out exception ofcourse. That is how the NH got it's shape. Pushing for that weight at young ages and speed of maturity. The longer and taller a bird is, the more frame it has to build. Or bone to grow out. This broad bird without the capacity of a longer bird is the reason for their historic reputation as average to good layers. The extra length of the Australorp is the opposite. Both had egg laying strains that did really well, so this isn't the best point, but you see what I am trying to say.
I am sure their is fault with what I have said. I see better than I say. My point is intended to be cosistant with my opinion that they do have slightly different body types, because the emphasis of the two are different. Close, but different. The closest bird to the NH in the SOP is the Delaware, the biggest difference being length and color.
Now what they have evolved to be? That is another subject.
I will continue to agree that there are similarities, and even in their development.
I hope this isn't taken as a negative. I enjoy reading your posts and thread. I have learned a lot. I guess that you can figure something like this coming from a NH enthusiast.
Where do I insert the smilies?