What chicken breeds are closest to "your grandfather's chicken"?

Pics
As far as the classic farmyard chicken, rather than feral chickens...
They were mixed blood from family flocks settlers brought over with them. Fed meat & milk & veg, not just scratch. They culled them by 2 years old, only keeping a few over winter, so it didn't matter if they got too much fat or developed health problems. Such birds could always be stew. They still didn't get many eggs.

But the true breed "Heritage fowl" are actually quite modern.
You have to go back farther than grandparents to find when everything changed, about 178 years ago...

_______________________________________________________________

The Forgotten History of ‘Hen Fever’

The mid-19th century was bursting with economic bubbles. There was the speculative bubble in Latin America, followed by the land bubble, followed by the railroad bubble, followed by yet another railroad bubble. And as sure as each was to swell speculator’s pockets, they would all eventually burst, leaving thousands in fiscal ruin.

Often forgotten in the histories of these economic upheavals is the much smaller, although no less significant, chicken bubble. From roughly 1845 to 1855, the United States was infected with an insatiable and unprecedented “Hen Fever,” an obsession with owning and breeding the world’s finest chickens. “Never in the history of modern ‘bubbles,'” writes George P. Burnham, in his book, The History of the Hen Fever, A Humorous Record, “did any mania exceed in ridiculousness or ludicrousness, or in the number of its victims surpass this inexplicable humbug.”

The incubus of this pandemic was the aviary of Queen Victoria. The young monarch was incredibly fond of her royal menagerie, a collection of exotic birds and beast that was constantly being refilled by her brave British explorers returning from their adventures abroad. In 1842, her biological assemblage was blessed with a gift of seven exotic chickens from the Far East known as Cochin China Fowl.

The queen and her fellow countrymen had never seen anything like these birds before. With their slender legs, elongated necks, and vibrant auburn feathers, with the ending flourish of a green-black tail, these elegant Asian fowl made quite the contrast to the scruffy chickens native to the British Isles. The queen was immediately smitten. Victoria built these Cochin a new and extravagant aviary, which was soon filled with other exotic breeds like the Shanghai, and would spend hours luxuriating there over tea. Once they bred, she immediately sent her bird’s eggs to her royal relatives throughout Europe, who too quickly were abuzz over these exotic fowl.

The society papers got wind of the Queen’s new hobby and the English eagerly emulated their monarch’s passion. By 1845, Victorians of all stripes were breeding and exchanging exotic and exorbitantly priced chickens.
Americans were soon infected with this Hen Fever, too, culminating in the pomp and circumstance of the Boston Poultry Show of 1849. Over ten thousand spectators swarmed the Public Gardens to view a veritable Noah’s ark of chirping, screeching, and squawking birds. It was, as one contemporaneous commentator declared, “indeed a magnificent exhibition.”

And from the Public Garden of Boston, the pox of chicken fascination spread to doctors, to lawyers, to farmers, to merchants, and to tradesmen of every color.

The inaugural show hatched a second show in Boston the following year and then a national show in New York. Within the next half-decade, local and regional exhibitions were popping up throughout the country, all featuring an ever-growing number of new, exotic, and expensive chicken breeds.

If one wanted to pinpoint the beginning of the chicken industry in the United States, this was it. For the first time in the nation’s history, the chicken was important. Where before the bird was so lowly that landowners neglected to record it as property in their farm inventories, now poultry fanatics found themselves spending $1 on a single egg or up to $120 on a pair of fowls, the equivalent of $30 and $3,600 today.

Up until 1845, the chicken was also thought of as the mongrel of the farmyard, left to roam freely and spread its genetic material in whatever ways its birdbrain saw fit. But these shows created standards of judging and perfection, causing self-proclaimed hen men to develop what are now coveted as Heritage Breed chickens. The most notable variety to come out of the Hen Fever was the robust and fluffy Brahma, the “King of all Poultry,” a handful of which George P. Burnham himself sent to an excited and grateful Queen Victoria in 1852.

While the emphasis of the Hen Fever was on a bird’s external beauty, the outcome had an unintended impact on the American plate as well. With more chickens came more eggs, which meant that what was considered a great “thinking food” was now increasingly a democratic food as well. Cheap eggs, remarked one editorialist for the New York Times in 1854, “then, is the practical and excellent issue of the poultry fever.” And for this reason, and this reason alone, the country should “Let it rage,” proclaims the editorial.

But as quickly as the fascination with fowls spread, the chicken bubble burst. The 19th century version of the Beanie Babies craze was through. By 1855, the market was over-saturated with expensive chickens that suddenly no one seemed to have any interest in anymore. Where once these chickens were so valuable fanciers hired bodyguards to protect their chicken coops, the prices commanded by exotic fowls as the pandemic started to convalesce barely covered the freight costs of shipping them over from Asia.

“You can’t get rid of these birds!” wrote one disgruntled chicken owner in 1855, as recounted in Burnham’s book. “It is useless to try to sell them; you can’t give them away; nobody will take them. You can’t starve them, for they are fierce and dangerous when aggravated, and will kick down the strongest store-closet door; and you can’t kill them, for they are tough as rhinoceroses, and tenacious of life as cats.” While some struggled with their lingering birds, Burnham at least found a way to properly dispose of what was once a feathered fortune–a glorious Shanghai dinner, featuring soup a la Shanghai, broiled Shanghai chicks, fricasseed Shanghaes, stewed Shanghai chickens, curried Shanghai fowls, coddled Shanghai stags, and Shanghae chicken pie.

Today we may have much less exotic tastes, but the fever for eating chicken and eggs remains strong (See The Surprising Ways Chickens Changed the World.) But since about one-third of chicken breeds face extinction, thanks to our reliance on a few standard breeds, maybe it’s time to take another peek under those green tail feathers (see Counting on Uncommon Chickens.)
Why Did the Chicken Cross the World and The History of Hen Fever are both lovely books.
 
Just my two cents. When there is reduced availability, feed costs go sky high, or you just can't find feed, chickens will have to free range. Better they learn from the get go. But then I have enough land for them to fend for themselves. My flock gets limited chicken feed. They are let out first thing in the morning and they put themselves up at night. The hens know where the nest boxes are. Not that I don't have a few hard heads that like to see me searching for eggs. Down side, best not try to walk barefoot in the yard. ;)
My chicks are precious, my hens are sweet, my roosters helpful, but they are not pets. No kumbaya here.
 
Last edited:
Just my two cents. When there is reduced availability, feed costs go sky high, or you just can't find feed, chickens will have to free range. Better they learn from the get go. But then I have enough land for them to fend for themselves. My flock gets limited chicken feed. They are let out first thing in the morning and they put themselves up at night. The hens know where the nest boxes are. Not that I don't have a few hard heads that like to see me searching for eggs. Down side, best not try to walk barefoot in the yard. ;)
My chicks are precious, my hens are sweet, my roosters helpful, but they are not pets. No kumbaya here.
That's the way it should be.
 
Before the 1910s the average hen laid far less than 200 eggs per year. The tradition was to keep a few birds for breeding over the winter - but most of the birds that were a year old wound up on the table.

Concentrated breeding and selection by professor Dryden at Oregon Agricultural College produced hens that could easily lay 200 eggs, and then hens that could lay 300 eggs in a year of lay. Producing more eggs required more calcium, more lipids, more proteins, and more carbohydrates along with all of the minerals and any vitamins the hen didn't synthesize for herself. More and better feed was required to maintain a heavy layer in good health versus the feed required to feed an early 20th C hen who laid 75 - 100 eggs in a year.

Yes, you can let them "free range" - but if you don't have a garden with abundant insects and a sheep, horse, cow, or goat to provide manure rich in bot larvae and those insects that come to colonize that manure, it is going to be a rough time.
 
I hope this question makes sense. I'm newer to chickens and did not grow up in a family that had them. On BYC, and in real life, I have heard people say that their grandparents didn't feed their chickens any commercial feed, but simply threw the flock a small amount of grains/scratch such as corn, oats, barley, etc. every day and let them find the rest of their food by grazing. People have said you can't do that with today's chickens because they are bred to produce eggs so much that they have dietary needs only the commercial feed can meet. So my question is, is this really true, or are there still breeds that can survive this way? If so, which breeds?

This is all hypothetical, but I can't help but wonder how families raised eggs and meat for hundreds of years using these methods, and now suddenly we can't. I understand why my production RIR can't live on a handful of scratch every day, but I even hear people say the heritage breeds can't. Are we too far away breeding-wise from the breeds of old to do this? Or were chickens back then actually very short-lived and our standards are higher now so we feed this higher quality feed? Well, this has turned into more than one question so I'll stop here, but let me know what you guys think.

Edit: I also wanted to add that I do understand the chickens way back when produced fewer eggs and less meat. I am just asking about why chickens supposedly can't be raised at all using this method anymore.
Commercial feed is not a higher quality, it is lower quality made from manufacturing by-products which cannot meet nutritional requirements, therefore supplemented with synthetic nutrients and designed for commercial production where the birds have a maximum life expectancy of one year.

It is a fallacy that one must provide commercial feed to meet nutritional needs of today's breeds. The ability to meet the nutritional needs on free-range depends greatly on the environment you can provide for them. You can't expect chickens to survive, let alone thrive, in a small yard without additional feed.

I have Chantecler and Kraienkopp breeds that free range/forage for their food 100% in spring, summer and fall. But unlike most people, I live on an island with an abundance of amphipods and other crustacean that provides for the nutrients my flocks need. If left to their own devices in reproduction, males will seek out high fertility females (not necessarily high productivity) and over many generations you may see egg production fall slightly, but one can intervene and select hens for higher egg production. I prefer to not intervene and let nature reign. Criteria for breed selection varies from one individual to another, my criterion for a dual purpose heritage fowl was based on my individual requirements, and the natural feed environment load capability. I average 100 eggs per week from 25 hens.

Note: People can be stupid. You cannot expect fowl to forage in a small grass yard and not provide food. I acquired a six month old duck from such a person, the duck was extremely malnourished, nothing but bone, feathers couldn't shed water. I rehabilitated her in just 10 days of 100% amphipod diet, she doubled in weight and was capable of foraging on her own and is still going strong at 8 years old.
 
Last edited:
Commercial feed is not a higher quality, it is lower quality made from manufacturing by-products which cannot meet nutritional requirements, therefore supplemented with synthetic nutrients and designed for commercial production where the birds have a maximum life expectancy of one year.

It is a fallacy that one must provide commercial feed to meet nutritional needs of today's breeds. The ability to meet the nutritional needs on free-range depends greatly on the environment you can provide for them. You can't expect chickens to survive, let alone thrive, in a small yard without additional feed.

I have Chantecler and Kraienkopp breeds that free range/forage for their food 100% in spring, summer and fall. But unlike most people, I live on an island with an abundance of amphipods and other crustacean that provides for the nutrients my flocks need. If left to their own devices in reproduction, males will seek out high fertility females (not necessarily high productivity) and over many generations you may see egg production fall slightly, but one can intervene and select hens for higher egg production. I prefer to not intervene and let nature reign. Criteria for breed selection varies from one individual to another, my criterion for a dual purpose heritage fowl was based on my individual requirements, and the natural feed environment load capability.

Note: People can be stupid. You cannot expect fowl to forage in a small grass yard and not provide food. I acquired a six month old duck from such a person, the duck was extremely malnourished, nothing but bone, feathers couldn't shed water. I rehabilitated her in just 10 days of 100% amphipod diet, she doubled in weight and was capable of foraging on her own and is still going strong at 8 years old.
That's really interesting! Your setup sounds really cool. But it also makes me wonder: I've heard that many insects' populations are declining in the US due to pesticides, invasive species, and other factors. I can even subjectively tell there are fewer worms around than when I was a kid. I wonder if this could also be a factor in how people were able to raise chickens without commercial feed. You're able to do it because you still have an abundant protein source available naturally on your island. My area does not have as much of that. Just a thought.
 
That's really interesting! Your setup sounds really cool. But it also makes me wonder: I've heard that many insects' populations are declining in the US due to pesticides, invasive species, and other factors. I can even subjectively tell there are fewer worms around than when I was a kid. I wonder if this could also be a factor in how people were able to raise chickens without commercial feed. You're able to do it because you still have an abundant protein source available naturally on your island. My area does not have as much of that. Just a thought.
Yes, I suspect much damage has been done environmentally. I'm very cognizant of the fragility of the ecosystem. Here we have pristine ocean and forest and we live off grid and try to minimize our presence. We use creek water and lichen tea for washing hair and body, for everything else we only use baking soda and water.
 
I think when people think of the chickens that survived on the farms in the early 1900's they forget a major protein food source. The fat scraps ect. from the butchering of wild game and other animals on the farm. My mom raised chickens with out commercial feed or grain Her chickens had access to the bugs from the manure, as well as left over food from the cattle, (mostly just hay scraps), but their main source of food was the "chicken bucket". That is all scraps from preparing the meal including anything trimmed off of the meat for the day that most often was venison even though it was a beef farm because the beef was valuable for selling. (Not many scraps from after as what was on the plate was to be eaten). These birds were not game hens. Some were EE.
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom