Shooting is a permeant solution to an instance of a problem, but not the main problem itself. So you killed your neighbor's pet. Congratulations. I understand that it's the neighbor's responsibility to care for their pet, not yours. But what happens when another neighbor moves in with a loose dog? Or a stray dog roams by? Or if a usually responsible owner's dog slips out by mistake and attacks before the owner is able to recapture it? You have three more dead dogs and it might've not even saved your chickens in time. You're not always going to be there to shoot. The best thing is just having a really good defense. Yeah, it's annoying to pay for extra protection against your neighbor's carelessness. But it's a good idea to do anyway. Your chickens are safe, the others keep their pets, and the original owner's dog ends up flat in the road anyway.
Also, even if you are within the law to use lethal force, you'll gain the everlasting loathing of your neighbor. You can bet that they will watch meticulously for any little mishap that they could use to indict you and have your chickens taken away (If you are living in an area where the city has certain limits on raising chickens).
Also, even if you are within the law to use lethal force, you'll gain the everlasting loathing of your neighbor. You can bet that they will watch meticulously for any little mishap that they could use to indict you and have your chickens taken away (If you are living in an area where the city has certain limits on raising chickens).
Last edited: