SO if I glance at this:
and immediately think "that's stupid", understand that basis for my opinion is [partially] captured in the posts above. I believe it an educated and well considered opinion. Its a reasonably safe bet that whomever is sharing/reposting that on social media knows less...
As others have wisely observed above. This recipe is advertised as "keeping your hens laying all winter long". Chicken's rate of lay is controlled largely by genetics, reduces with increase in age, and affected seasonally by average light levels, NOT nutrition. Setting aside that its not good...
For our 33% increase in feed costs, plus the hassle of mixing it, and the hope that the chickens don't pick out favorites and leave other stuff behind {like red millet - disfavored by most birds, dirt cheap, and a significant component in both the mixed bird seed and many 5 grain "Scratch"...
Math. As promised. I'm going to pick on Purina in this example (BOTH Purina's) because they are readily available throughout the U.S., where this idiocy probably started, and because [at least locally] they are cheaper than Nutrena, $/#. I'm going to pick on Pennington for the same reasons -...
I will sit down at my computer tomorrow, link some samples and show the math. I see that recipe and immediately thinks stupid, but I understand it would be helpful to others if they saw why I thought that.
It's not cheaper.
It's not superior nutrition.
I can think of no rational reason for doing this.
I can only assume your mother saw this on some social media site, has not recently priced rabbit food, bird seed, or cat food, and has spared no time to critically thinking this thru.
Your gut is...
No, you hit on a key issue a lot of people are unaware of. Top production breeds have sharp reductions in productivity. A bird that produces 300 eggs in its prime year might produce 220 its second, and only 150 its third - at which point you are feeding two birds for the production of one...
It hurts to admit there are things I just can't seem to learn. Chicken genetics and Calc1 are among them. [Calc 2 was EASY! Calc 1 still makes no sense]. Mostly, I get by.
It has been explained to me many times chicken genetics is a hole where information goes in. And just pours right out for me. Ultimately, I am just removing things I don't want from my flock until the only things left are colors and patterns that I do want.
I'm not either, but I don't think so??? My understanding is that its only dominant over one color, not both the other options. Chicken genetics give me headaches.
Better options in the grow out pen. Yes, that's their water, changed yesterday. Have to dump that every day.
Today is "Freedom Friday", the door is open, they get to join the free range flock.
Genetic throwbacks for freezer camp. Hate dominant white.
My last all white birds were more than a year ago, then I get two in one hatch. :( (Also a (nearly) all black - still popping at least one of those each hatching).
Oh, and re: roosters. 1 rooster : 10 hens +/- is the ratio given to maximize FERTILITY. Has nothing to do with behavior. Space is a social lubricant. My birds have roughly 5 acres to roam, and routinely ignore the electric fence to wander elsewhere on my 30a. I have had R:H ratios as high...
as to numbers? I've had close to 100 poultry on my property at once, as few as 12. Its essentially the same amount of labor either way. That's why profitable have farms scaled up. They are able to amortize nearly fixed labor costs over a larger number of birds/egg sales. They have also...
From a profitability perspective, I do a lot of things right - high nutritional quality, low cost feed from a local mill, hatching my own so as to not pay replacement costs, feed supplementation via low maintenance varied pasturage to further bend the feed curve. Deep litter method to produce...