Search results for query: *

  1. N

    pure richardson strain red jungle fowl

    Yes, they are. Hopefully you were successful in getting chicks this year.
  2. N

    pure richardson strain red jungle fowl

    I'm curious to know. Who did you get your Richardson's from?
  3. N

    pure richardson strain red jungle fowl

    Quote: I think he is on byc too. I remember reading his posts in the peacock section. His rjf are what I would consider pure. Too bad it's exceptionally difficult to get them into the U.S.
  4. N

    pure richardson strain red jungle fowl

    Quote: It's like what De Wet says. Go to Google and image search "eclipse molt, red jungle fowl" and it'll show you some examples.
  5. N

    pure richardson strain red jungle fowl

    The hen looks like a much better specimen. I cannot determine if it is pure or not from just the single picture alone. As an fyi, not having combs and lappets is required of a pure specimen, but at the same time, not having a comb doesn't mean that it is pure. There are confirmed hybrids...
  6. N

    pure richardson strain red jungle fowl

    Quote: When you mentioned Sri lanka, I first thought you meant the Ceylon junglefowl. Anyway, your birds are nice and are good representatives of the wild bird, but they for sure are not pure. In addition to the presence of a comb on the female, the color of their legs appears too light...
  7. N

    pure richardson strain red jungle fowl

    Quote: If you're referring to the comb, then no, a hen shouldn't have a crest. At most, you should see a nub. Pictures would be nice if you could provide them.
  8. N

    pure richardson strain red jungle fowl

    Nice. Are you getting adult birds or birds that will hatch this year?
Back
Top Bottom