Search results for query: *

Yes, i should've said "develop perfectly on track the way nature intended" instead of successfully develop.

This study is for short term emergency power outages, not consistent temperatures the entire incubation. It focuses on natural temperature dips compared to when hens leave the nest. The study also states that temperatures consistently below the optimum hen temperature (99.5) will slow...

I absolutely did not say people cant have successful hatches unless they do it exactly the way i say? I just said the lower temperatures can be a factor, and that seasoned hatchers recommend higher temperatures rather than lower ones. Those are facts, not my personal opinions. High hatch rates...

Oh. Are you sure? Ive never heard of 95 degrees. That seems dramatically low.

Studies and seasoned high rate hatching experience are two different things.

Im not talking about the short term dips, but even with a consistent 99.5 ambient temperature, odds are is its a tad cooler inside the egg. If 99.5 is the lowest end of the development stage, and it becomes iffy and dicey, its safer and best to have a higher temp.

honestly, i think your temperature is just to low. 99.5 degrees farenheit is the minimum temperature an embryo can successfully develop at. And thats internal temperature of the egg, not the ambient temperature. If the ambient temperature was only 98-99.5, chances are the internal temperature...

Im not sure if someone's already replied to this, but no. This is very likely not the problem. You do not have to keep the humidity at this level. In fact, theres not to much evidence that high humidity incubations are a whole lot more successful than dry incubation. Alot of people have the same...