Search results for query: *

They're a lethal gene and I just find them pointless. Plus they make it so much harder to hatch shipped eggs since there's already a lower chance with shipped eggs, PLUS odds of lethality for at least some of the surfing embryos. If they weren't lethal, I might be attracted to them

Not a fan of that breed because of those darn tufts. But that's the breed standard, so they have to.

Personally I love rumpless birds. Wish I could get some of that tuftless rumpless breed.

In my genetics book, scientists purposely (somehow gently) shook eggs during incubation and before and ender up with a noticeable percentage (I think it was like 7 percent) of surviving embryos that showed the trait when they didn't have the genetics

Looks like a leghorn or cornishx

It's fine if it's genetic. Won't harm any birds and unlikely you'll get a ton with only one parent having it.

It can be genetic or from a flaw in development in the egg. If it's gebetic, it will have poor fertility, if it's a flaw in development it Should be fine to get chicks from