Day 3 of recovery. She and her sister were found at a pond a little over a week ago. She’s had swollen feet since we met her. The humane society mandated a 6-day hold on them, before we could adopt them. We knew it was bumblefoot, and could treat her, but they insisted on the wait. Until then, she received no special care, save for a vet exam with little findings and no treatment. He was obviously not familiar with anatidae. In fact, the conditions she was kept in at the humane society were worse than the pond they were dumped at, and Im surprised she made it to us! They seem very young, and are likely bonded siblings. Less than a year old, and I believe that’s the biggest contributor to her survival. Her attitude is still very good! Eating and drinking with vigor, and doesnt seem to mind walking, as clumsy as she is in this condition. Right foot (infection removed) is still healing and looking good around the site. Left foot still presenting no wound, so it’s hard to tell if the infection is up top, or on the underside. Epsom compresses seem to be slowly bringing something to the surface on the side of the leg, at the ankle joint, but nothing obvious yet. Until there’s a turn in her behavior, we continue to treat with ACV, liquid vitamin supplement, baths, epsom compresses, and boots with vetericyn and neosporin. Is it safe to cut infection from the top of the foot, cutting through the scales if the infection presents there? And why is there no obvious wound on her worst foot? Is it possible the infection entered through the wound on the right foot, then spread to swell her left foot? Fairly experienced in treating bumblefoot, but not a case this severe, and Ive never seen it present without a “bumble.”