Quote:
Hens lay eggs whether there is a rooster in the flock or not. Don't need a rooster for hens to lay eggs, therefore the shell color is
entirely up to her genetics. All by herself, without any rooster.
Roosters just fertilize the eggs to make half of the chick.... not half of the egg shell.
no but the
rooster (
sire of the hen) is a
contributing factor towards the
genetics of the
hen that lays that egg, which is painted a particular color on the shell.
Sorry, but YOU do not understand what the previous poster is saying. Go back one generation, or jump forward one... This poster is taking in the past and the future... You are stuck in thinking in the present.
To go further...
You mate a RIR Roo (brown eggs), to a leghorn (white eggs). The hen will lay all white eggs, but her daughters will lay brown eggs and sons will possess the brown egg gene.
you then take those brown egg laying daughters, and mate them with a pure Araucana (blue eggs). Those hens will lay brown eggs, but their daughters will lay blue, green, and maybe olive eggs.
So there you have granddaughters of a white egg laying chicken, laying blue eggs... according to your justification, that is not possille b/c the rooster has nothing over egg color.. whereas here in 2 generations, the rooste completely changed the egg color.. If you were right, these chickens would still be laying white colored eggs...