Hi all
I have a question about flock dynamics, probably not for those with larger flocks but maybe smaller flocks or multiple, separated flocks.
The obvious ranking in my flock of 6 is:
#1 Matriach = Cilla just over 2.5 years old
#2 2IC = Dusty also just over 2.5 years old
#3 Next Blondie at just over 1.5 years old
#4 Then LuLu who is turning 2 in December
And then the two little ones, KiKi and Crystal who at 7 months old have settled into
#5 KiKi
#6 Crystal at the bottom
Before the little ones, the ranking was set in concrete and even with the little ones, it has been stable, after they sorted out between them who was going to be bottom
So basically #1 tends to boss everyone under her. #2 the same but does not try and boss #1. Again, same with #3, boss of everyone under her but submissive to those above. You get the idea, so on down the order.
However, over the last week, I have seen #3 submitting to #5 and #5 appears to think she is higher in the ranking than #3 BUT #5 is still submissive to #4 and #4 is still submissive to #3.
Funnily enough it is a hard question to phrase and I hope it makes sense .. Do others see the definite structure in their flock [1, 2, 3, 4, and so on] or do you also see this scenario where #5 can be boss over #3 but not #4 and #3 can be boss over #4 but not #5? So, a definite top and bottom and just dissension in the middle?
Or, do you think #5 could be taking on #3 which might automatically give her ranking over #4?
Hope that makes sense
I have a question about flock dynamics, probably not for those with larger flocks but maybe smaller flocks or multiple, separated flocks.
The obvious ranking in my flock of 6 is:
#1 Matriach = Cilla just over 2.5 years old
#2 2IC = Dusty also just over 2.5 years old
#3 Next Blondie at just over 1.5 years old
#4 Then LuLu who is turning 2 in December
And then the two little ones, KiKi and Crystal who at 7 months old have settled into
#5 KiKi
#6 Crystal at the bottom
Before the little ones, the ranking was set in concrete and even with the little ones, it has been stable, after they sorted out between them who was going to be bottom

So basically #1 tends to boss everyone under her. #2 the same but does not try and boss #1. Again, same with #3, boss of everyone under her but submissive to those above. You get the idea, so on down the order.
However, over the last week, I have seen #3 submitting to #5 and #5 appears to think she is higher in the ranking than #3 BUT #5 is still submissive to #4 and #4 is still submissive to #3.
Funnily enough it is a hard question to phrase and I hope it makes sense .. Do others see the definite structure in their flock [1, 2, 3, 4, and so on] or do you also see this scenario where #5 can be boss over #3 but not #4 and #3 can be boss over #4 but not #5? So, a definite top and bottom and just dissension in the middle?
Or, do you think #5 could be taking on #3 which might automatically give her ranking over #4?
Hope that makes sense

Last edited: