- May 2, 2018
- 3
- 3
- 59
Hello everyone,
I posted here a few months ago with some questions about my science experiment. Briefly, I am experimenting with Japanese quail eggs (Coturnix coturnix) to determine the temperature at which they die (I know, it's sad) and have been using the Buddy Heart Rate monitor to distinguish those eggs that are alive from those that are dead. On day 10 of incubation I take all the eggs (around 25) that are confirmed alive by the Buddy and expose them to heat. I then check for the presence or absence of a heart rate in all 25 eggs each day thereafter until day 15 of incubation. On day 15 they are all frozen and dissected for further measurements.
However, the Buddy Heart Rate monitor is giving me inconsistent results after the heat exposure - sometimes I have to rotate the egg 5-8 times for the infrared sensors to detect a heart rate, and sometimes the display will show non-rhythmic activity without a heart rate. Additionally, sometimes an egg does not have a heart rate (e.g. on day 12) but then the next day that same egg is showing a heart rate. Given the inconsistency I have been searching for an alternative noninvasive method to distinguish those eggs that are alive from those that are dead.
I placed a few eggs into a deep water bowl today and observed movement in some eggs and lack of movement in others (I'm assuming movement = alive and no movement = dead). Is this an effective way to tell if an egg died during development as a result of the heat? If this is effective, does anyone have a link to a scientific article confirming this? Or are there other methods that I am not aware of? To clarify, all 25 eggs were reliably confirmed alive through candling and the heart rate monitor from days 6-10... From days 11-15 there have been inconsistent readings on the heart rate monitor, presumably as a result of the heat exposure.
Thank you for your help in advance. I can also clarify any misunderstandings.
I posted here a few months ago with some questions about my science experiment. Briefly, I am experimenting with Japanese quail eggs (Coturnix coturnix) to determine the temperature at which they die (I know, it's sad) and have been using the Buddy Heart Rate monitor to distinguish those eggs that are alive from those that are dead. On day 10 of incubation I take all the eggs (around 25) that are confirmed alive by the Buddy and expose them to heat. I then check for the presence or absence of a heart rate in all 25 eggs each day thereafter until day 15 of incubation. On day 15 they are all frozen and dissected for further measurements.
However, the Buddy Heart Rate monitor is giving me inconsistent results after the heat exposure - sometimes I have to rotate the egg 5-8 times for the infrared sensors to detect a heart rate, and sometimes the display will show non-rhythmic activity without a heart rate. Additionally, sometimes an egg does not have a heart rate (e.g. on day 12) but then the next day that same egg is showing a heart rate. Given the inconsistency I have been searching for an alternative noninvasive method to distinguish those eggs that are alive from those that are dead.
I placed a few eggs into a deep water bowl today and observed movement in some eggs and lack of movement in others (I'm assuming movement = alive and no movement = dead). Is this an effective way to tell if an egg died during development as a result of the heat? If this is effective, does anyone have a link to a scientific article confirming this? Or are there other methods that I am not aware of? To clarify, all 25 eggs were reliably confirmed alive through candling and the heart rate monitor from days 6-10... From days 11-15 there have been inconsistent readings on the heart rate monitor, presumably as a result of the heat exposure.
Thank you for your help in advance. I can also clarify any misunderstandings.