(NAIS)=USDA Approves Chip Implants, that Cause Cancer Tumors

wilds of pa

Crowing
14 Years
Feb 17, 2007
2,601
36
319
The Blue Mountains of Pa
(NAIS)=National Animal Identification System

USDA Approves Chip Implants that Cause Cancer Tumors

Over the past couple of years, the OCA has reported on the National
Animal Identification System=nais , a set of controversial, mandatory
regulations the U.S. federal government claims to have abandoned to
the states, but in fact is still pushing, specifically, in the 2007
Farm Bill.

NAIS would require that all farmers and farm animal owners implant
their animals with a computer chip, even those who just own a single
cow, horse, chicken or other farm animal.

Last week, the USDA approved the use of two new types of chips for the
NAIS program. These same chips have already been planted in millions
of pets and marketed to pet owners as an ID device to help find lost
pets.

Increasingly, these same chips are being marketed and implanted into
humans. Evidence has now surfaced that a significant number of studies
done in the 1990s revealed that lab animals implanted with the devices
developed tumors.

When the FDA approved the use of the chips for human implanting, these
reports were never made public. In an interview with a retired
toxicologic pathologist who studied the chips for Dow Chemical, "The
transponders were the cause of the tumors."

Learn more:
<http://www.organicc onsumers. org/articles/ article_7570. cfm>
www.organicconsumer s.org/articles/ article_7570. cfm

Quick Related Fact

Who Approved Tumor-Causing Chips?

The FDA is overseen by the Department of Health and Human Services,
which, at the time of the original RFID chip's approval, was headed by
White House appointee Tommy Thompson.

Two weeks after the device's approval took effect on January 10, 2005,
Thompson left his Cabinet post, and within five months was a board
member of VeriChip Corporation, the company who designed the RFID
chip. He was compensated by VeriChip with cash and stock options.

In his public appearances, he continues to claim the chips are
completely safe and urges all citizens get the implants for the sake
of the health and safety of their families. To date, neither Thompson
nor any member of his family has had the chip implanted.
 
if they try to put one of those in my chickens....
smack.gif


somad.gif
rant.gif
 
There is an article on NAIS in the latest issue of Hobby Farms. It mentions the microchiping and that it causes cancer.
sad.png
I do not like NAIS, I do not like it at all. I do not see how it can benefit anyone.
 
I read an article somewhere and the only ppl it benefits are the big factory farms. Whenever you sell your animals, you have to pay money to some organization. But I think they are only going to micrichip horses as of now, I could be wrong but thats what I know. NAIS stinks.
 
Quote:
:thun
smack.gif
rant.gif
somad.gif
tongue.gif
factory farms! :mad: May a cursed wind from an unwholesome fen strike them down.

Quote:
That's not fair, horses are pets too! I ride every summer! grrrr...
somad.gif


Edited to say, sorry bout all the smilys, they just really expressed my anger without me having to put a RANT video on YouTube and post a link.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What part of this is supposed to be surprising??? Not surprised here. Government, duh!
smile.png


SAY NO TO NAIS!

(no offense to you wilds of pa!)
 
Last edited:
Please microchip your pets everybody. Being lost and killed/stolen/never finding home is a MUCH more common cause of pet loss than cancer secondary to microchips. There have been many studies showing a <1% risk in lab animals (much smaller than cats/dogs, microchip relatively huge), the numbers in dogs and cats have not followed these trends. There have been 2-3 reported cases in the US since 2004, and in Great Britain, 2 reported cases out of 4 million chips implanted.

See here if you want more info (scroll to bottom): http://www.avma.org/issues/microchipping/microchipping_bgnd.asp

This doesn't really have anything to do with NAIS, which I am uneducated about so far (need to work on that) and while I understand the worries about our food sources, I feel that this program really should not be applied to small producers, pets, etc.
 
Sorry Raindrop, but microchipping my pets isn't an option for me. There is not a system in place in the rural wilds of Oklahoma where I live. Likely, if one comes up missing, something or someone killed it. The second option is that someone stole it.

If I lived in the city, then sure. I probably would, but on the other hand... A lady I know lost her dog. It stayed at the pound for two days, even though she called them and gave a description and posted a description on their website. The dog had been microchipped, but no one at the pound even scanned him. This was in Dallas, TX.
sad.png
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom