The 'what breed would you not have again' thread makes me think it'd be good to get input on this before I get too far advanced in mulling things over
I am quite happy with my speckled sussexes and will be keeping them to work on, long-term. I want to noodge them towards decent laying and towards reaching as good a body size as possible within the first 16 wks, as spares are intended for the kitchen.
But the ISA Browns are almost gone now
; the campines were too <circles finger next to head> for me although if I could free range a flock they'd probably have been great; and the buff chanteclers are just not my thing.
I want something that will be a fairly efficient producer of eggs -- like, not eat mountains of feed in comparison to eggs produced -- and do so for some years (unlike the ISA Browns) and breed true (so no sexlinks in general). Smallish is quite ok, as the sussexes will take care of table needs. They do not have to be lap chickens but they DO have to tolerate being confined in a large coop and run without being so freakin' CRAZY all the time <aargh!> and picking on each other and generally needing to switch to decaf, like the campines were. Also, we get Cold Winters up here so no great big floppy combs.
Rosecomb leghorns sound appealing in many ways, but will they just be intolerably crazy and tasmanian-devil-y like the campines were? Easter eggers sound appealing too, if I could find a source of a line that lays really well. What do you think? Wanna suggest another option I should think about?
Thanks,
Pat, requiring a long running start to reach decisions like this so I need to start thinking about it *now*

I am quite happy with my speckled sussexes and will be keeping them to work on, long-term. I want to noodge them towards decent laying and towards reaching as good a body size as possible within the first 16 wks, as spares are intended for the kitchen.
But the ISA Browns are almost gone now

I want something that will be a fairly efficient producer of eggs -- like, not eat mountains of feed in comparison to eggs produced -- and do so for some years (unlike the ISA Browns) and breed true (so no sexlinks in general). Smallish is quite ok, as the sussexes will take care of table needs. They do not have to be lap chickens but they DO have to tolerate being confined in a large coop and run without being so freakin' CRAZY all the time <aargh!> and picking on each other and generally needing to switch to decaf, like the campines were. Also, we get Cold Winters up here so no great big floppy combs.
Rosecomb leghorns sound appealing in many ways, but will they just be intolerably crazy and tasmanian-devil-y like the campines were? Easter eggers sound appealing too, if I could find a source of a line that lays really well. What do you think? Wanna suggest another option I should think about?
Thanks,
Pat, requiring a long running start to reach decisions like this so I need to start thinking about it *now*

Last edited: