Howard, I certainly agree the Woods design works great, even in Canada. But how well do you think it would work on a 3’ x 5’ coop? Is that coop big enough for the concept to work? I don’t have any experience with the Woods coops but from several of your posts it sounds like you do. It seems to me that you need a certain size for that to work but “it seems to me” doesn’t mean nearly as much as actual experience.
3' x 5'? That seems pretty small. On another thread, I proposed plans for a smaller Woods coop in the range of 4' x 6.5'. The Woods "mini".........
https://www.backyardchickens.com/t/1131864/woods-house-mini
As noted, JackE voted against going that small. I am aware that Woods said in his book not to mess with his designs as they were carefully thought out. What I also note is he himself scaled the design up and down in size, but always kept things in the same proportions. Woods smallest design, intended for small backyard flocks like ours, was 6' x 10'. That was designed for up to 12 birds, but 4 or 5 or 6 would do well in it.
My thoughts are on the mini, as long as you kept the right proportion, it might work. Woods houses are rectangles with small side facing into the winter sun. The proportion of the rectangle is the long side (depth) is 1.6x to 2x the width, with roost bars along the narrow side to the far back. The long sided rectangle is what creates the dead pocket of air in the back. Woods called it an "air cushion" or some such thing. I have hung flagging tape streamers in mine and have watched them in the wind. There is some turbulence at the front, but it decreases from front to back, with streamers in the back barely moving at all. I note the same thing happens in the attached shed of our horse barn, which is a long narrow rectangle, open side on the narrow leg. A lot of air movement at the opening, but it immediately calms down as you move back into the shed.
What you do want to avoid is to avoid changing the proportions. The height to width proportions, nor the back part deeper or more shallow, or changing the shape and proportion of the front scratch shed.
In reality, a Woods house is more run than coop. It is essentially a covered run that has three sides mostly enclosed, but one side wide open for light and ventilation. The angles of the roof lines and position of the window openings set to allow the light from the winter sun to shine in all the way to the back. If you look at it like that, there is no advantage of my 4' x 6.5' mini, with run, over the 6' x 10' Woods coop. They have the same overall foot print.