Quote:
wow - that was kinda harsh...it's not even my rooster, and the "bad version" comment offended me...I agree that he's not a show quality ANYTHING, but come on, let's not be snooty about it please...
I appreciate everyone's input...I'll let his owner know what you all think!
wow - that was kinda harsh...it's not even my rooster, and the "bad version" comment offended me...I agree that he's not a show quality ANYTHING, but come on, let's not be snooty about it please...
I appreciate everyone's input...I'll let his owner know what you all think!
I didn't mean "bad version" that way. I just used it as a term to describe that his color and type is off standard. I am sorry if it offended you. would using the term "his color does not conform to the standard" offend you less?
BTW. My birds are bad versions to, and I have mutts in the bator.
Quote:
I didn't mean "bad version" that way. I just used it as a term to describe that his color and type is off standard. I am sorry if it offended you. would using the term "his color does not conform to the standard" offend you less?
BTW. My birds are bad versions to, and I have mutts in the bator.
No problem...I guess I am just used to milder terminology...
That's the only bad thing about these forums, you have to interpret the emotion behind the words...thanks!