The phrasing of this question is really quite inflammatory.
Chickens are livestock. The purpose of the existence of livestock is to benefit humans.
Chickens are animals, not humans. Only humans can be enslaved. Domestic animals are property by nature.
Some people make pets of their livestock, many people become quite fond of their livestock and enjoy their personalities, and only sick, disturbed people would keep animals that they disliked and did not want to be healthy and well-treated. But the moral responsibility to treat livestock well does not change the fact that they are inherently animals kept for the purpose of human benefit.
There is no incompatibility between loving and enjoying chickens and expecting them to earn their keep by doing what chickens do -- keep pests down in the yard and garden, providing eggs, and, when appropriate, providing dinner.
Chickens are livestock. The purpose of the existence of livestock is to benefit humans.
Chickens are animals, not humans. Only humans can be enslaved. Domestic animals are property by nature.
Some people make pets of their livestock, many people become quite fond of their livestock and enjoy their personalities, and only sick, disturbed people would keep animals that they disliked and did not want to be healthy and well-treated. But the moral responsibility to treat livestock well does not change the fact that they are inherently animals kept for the purpose of human benefit.
There is no incompatibility between loving and enjoying chickens and expecting them to earn their keep by doing what chickens do -- keep pests down in the yard and garden, providing eggs, and, when appropriate, providing dinner.