Plymouth Rock thread!

Hey guys I have a question

I was told light barred Plymouth Rock lay brown eggs is that correct? If so my pullet is laying white eggs what does that mean?

California grays lay white eggs. Your picture shows a cuckoo patterned bird she very well could have gotten mixed up in the bin of BRs it could be easily done as they look identical at hatch.

http://www.feathersite.com/Poultry/CGA/CalGray/BRKCalGray.html


Jeff



the pic above is not a leghorn body.
 
the pic above is not a leghorn body.
Yeah its not an any breed body. 'bout what is expected of a hatcheries stuff.
hu.gif
I was just giving a barred(cuckoo) patterned white egg layer option is all. It could very well be a factory mistake too I've had a few in the past you ought to see the "Ideal" BR rooster I have now,
roll.png
he is quite different himself but he sires good, production type barred, brown egg layers for sure.

Jeff
 
It is always nice to get that first egg!!! Yesterday I got my first BR egg after waiting 7 months. I have 8 pullets that are really knock down gorgeous. They sure are quite about the egg laying, never did any talking or hunting for a nest. I knew they were getting close because of there comb and wattles but it was a surprise but a nice surprise

Scott
 
Valuable breeding information on the Silver Penciled Plymouth Rocks by Bob Hawes.

In “The Plymouth Rocks,” a Reliable Poultry Journal publication of 1911, Thoe. Wittman wrote, “A well colored and marked Silver Penciled Plymouth Rock is a wonderfully beautiful bird, and the time is likely coming when they will take their place as one of the popular and leading varieties.” Well, the Silver Penciled Rock was a useful variety but never did become a commercial contender. However, Mr. Wittman was correct in that the SP is a beautiful bird when well-bred. Unfortunately, the writers of the Standard called for a pattern that is somewhat of a challenge. I feel that some folks give up the bird when they see the difficulties in producing both exhibition males and females from the same pen.

In New England we have some superior Silver Penciled bantams coming mainly from Guy Roy and Bob Murphy, plus Bob has loyally kept some very nice SP large fowl for many years. The males, especially the bantam males, are really showstoppers with their silvery white wingbows and clear black breasts. Plus they have Rock type: wide backs that carry well back, good fronts and nice heads. A fault to guard against in the males is brassiness in the top plumage. Nothing detracts more from the overall appearance of a Silver Penciled male from any breed than the dirty white color that we sometimes see in the hackle, wingbows and saddles.

A further problem with this brassiness in males is that it will show up in the females and give them an overall rusty appearance. I owned a pullet that was 1 st in a rather large class at the Boston Show few years back. I hadn’t been breeding the SP too long and so I asked the judge why I took 1 st against some very good competition. He said, “Look at the rusty shade on all those other females.” He was right; mine was the only female that had the silvery white shade that is called for. I confess that it was pure luck!

Of course, after body type, the first order of business in females is penciling. There is a difference between the APA and the ABA in this description. The APA Standard states, “Each feather in the back, breast, body, wing bows, and thighs should have three or more pencilings.” The ABA calls for, “three distinct black pencilings on the breast” and for the back, “steel gray, with distinct black pencilings, outlines of which should conform to the outline of the feather,” no mention of the numbers of pencilings. The ABA requirements are more realistic if one is using a single mating system. Most breeders are producing a “male line” and males more often catch the judge’s eye. Males have sharp demarcations of color and it’s easier to defend your decision. But exhibition males do not beget exhibition females. The penciling on the daughters of these males is just not as sharp as the Standard demands.

Watch the overall color on pullets. It should be a bright silvery-gray with sharp contrasting penciling. The APA description says that the penciling “Should not be black because that destroys the even shade of gray that is desired.” But the ABA calls for “black penciling,” so take your choice. The important thing about the penciling is that it should be distinct and should follow the contour of the feather. It’s pretty easy to get good penciling on the breast but it’s not so easy to have a well penciled back, and that’s what the judge first examines. There are some judges who can appreciate a good female; at the 2007 Boston Show the BV was a pullet.

Other traits to watch for in females are crow heads and poorly serrated combs. Remember that the comb on the female is going to be enlarged about 3x on her sons and what seems like a minor fault in the dam can be a real defect in the male offspring. Watch for leg color; too many SP have very pale, almost white legs. We can accept some paleness in females from egg production but when it causes white legs in the male offspring one has to think it may be genetic. A couple of handfuls of scratch feed in the litter in late afternoon prevents the “white leg syndrome” in my pens. This extra corn does not seem to contribute to brassiness in the males (sunlight may, however).

One other area that I think needs to be watched in SP is the amount of fluff under the tail. In some cases both males and females have a gap between the lower main tail feathers and the start of the fluff. This to me gives the tail a sort of tube-like appearance. The ABA Standard calls for the fluff to be, “rather full and of moderate length.” Look at your birds in profile and you’ll see what I am describing.

Both the APA and ABA Standards call for the female’s head to be a “silvery gray.” In some birds the penciling goes up over the head, and gives a “dark gray” appearance. I prefer the contrast of the “silvery” heads as seen in the drawings in the APA Standard and in the older breed books. I think if you are using only one mating pen, that the exhibition male will naturally produce these silvery-headed females. And finally, the Standards call for the fluff to be penciled in the females - lots of luck with that!

In the large fowl, of course, size is always a consideration. For the most part the SP cannot compete with the Barreds and the Whites in terms of body weight. The Dark Brahma was one of the original ancestors of the SP Rock. How about revisiting the old family homestead for a little infusion of new blood?

Without resorting to the rather complicated and space-consuming “double mating” system there is a system for producing both exhibition-type males and females from the same pen and it’s called the “two female color system.” Head the pen with an exhibition male and use 2-3 well-laced females plus 1-2 of the “mossy-backed” females, those having good heads and combs. These latter females will produce the exhibition males. Keep a couple of the daughters from the mossy-backed females for next year’s male breeding. The drawback of using only one pen is that the offspring cannot be identified by dam unless trap nests are used. Having two pens available, one for each type of female, would get around this problem and you are still not actually following a “double mating” system. Read about this system in the Plymouth Rock Standard and Breed Book, pub by the APA, 1919. This book can probably be borrowed on inter –library loan thru your local library.

These are a few thoughts from an amateur breeder. My experience has been only with bantams. Try the Silver Penciled, bantam or large. They lay well and they hatch well. Don’t worry that each and every bird is not exhibition quality, just enjoy them, and at the same time you will preserve a little Plymouth Rock history.


We have Horstman chicks about 5 or 6 months old. Not laying. The cockerels legs are nice and orange. But the hens legs are more pale with dark grey down the fronts extending over the toes. Their beaks are also sort of grey across the tops. Is this normal?
 
We have Horstman chicks about 5 or 6 months old. Not laying. The cockerels legs are nice and orange. But the hens legs are more pale with dark grey down the fronts extending over the toes. Their beaks are also sort of grey across the tops. Is this normal?
The legs should be yellow, but I suspect that's what you're seeing. Leg color is an issue with the silver penciled variety; some of them have "dusky" yellow color. I recently spoke with APA judge Rip Stalvey in reagrd to the dusky yellow, and in synopsis, his reply to me was that so long as they are in the "realm" of yellow, they would not be marked down.

The females typically do have that darker shading down the front of their shanks.
 
We have Horstman chicks about 5 or 6 months old. Not laying. The cockerels legs are nice and orange. But the hens legs are more pale with dark grey down the fronts extending over the toes. Their beaks are also sort of grey across the tops. Is this normal?


Hi 4Hgirl
Yes this is normal and the yellow legs can be difficult to obtain at times in the female Silver Penciled Plymouth Rocks. In the females a more Dusky Yellow color will be seen more times than not, but Yellow is preferred by the Standard of Perfection. There are a few things you can do to bring out the yellow in the legs. Plenty of free range as some greens like marigolds and so on will help. A handful of scratch feed daily may also help a little. But overall it is best to selective breed for the more yellow colored legs in your females as it would be better to have it through genetics rather that food supplements.

As for the dark strip down the front of the legs of the females it is more associated with a darker breeding line of SPPRs or what you would see and breed for in a Double Mating System "cockerel line". In my opinion most of the Silver Penciled Plymouth Rock lines today are of the darker breeding method "cockerel line" to secure the solid black breast in the males. Therefore the females of this breeding will have the darker strip down the legs.
 
Last edited:
Who said in my poultry yard? I said I can sell the culls from a breeding program. Plenty of folks have no idea there is any standard for chickens and just want good backyard birds. They are the ones who end up with my culls, most of which are still far superior to hatchery stock that they would otherwise be stuck with. Besides, I have a laying flock that is full of show quality birds who have aged as well as "culls" as you'd call them. I have plenty of room for good layers, plenty.

ETA: And, by the way, there are may folks on this thread with good old hatchery stock who would love to post pictures of their Plymouth Rocks. I want them to feel as welcome to do so as anyone with those "perfect" birds. I started with hatchery stock and I have a 4 yr old hatchery descended hen, a "cull", who outlays all of my younger, better quality Rock hens still. She can stay forever. Plenty of room for Fern. Since I do have chickens for eggs, if a perfect-per-Standard hen never lays, she is a cull around here. And you know what culls are called at my place? Pets. They don't live forever. And they at least give me fertilzer, which is more than I could say for a dog, so they aren't doing nothing, certainly.

I don't want to run off all the folks with their "normal" Rocks from this thread. They are welcome to be here and post as much as any with birds with "name brands".
Thank you from a grateful 'lurker'!
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom