- Thread starter
- #11
Not that this is any help........but those with dogs and dog problems might find this interesting..........the origin of the phrase, " a dog is a man's best friend".
The case of Old Drum........
https://www.sos.mo.gov/archives/education/olddrum/StoryofBurdenvHornsby
https://www.sos.mo.gov/CMSImages/MDH/EulogyoftheDog.pdf
Note this all took place in 1869, so is evidence that neighbors and their dogs have been causing each other problems for what seems like forever, yet aside from folks being responsible for their dogs, no good solution has ever been devised because people in the country with dogs tend to let them run wild (are not responsible). This and other cases like it are also what have lead to laws about how to deal with dogs and when you can and can't harm one. A tough thing to decide in the split second a person needs to make the decision to take lethal force and deal with the consequences later.
None of us are immune to the problem. Two days ago I looked out the window from where I am sitting now to see a Doberman and another large mutt "marking" the bushes of my front step, no more than 15' away from me (chickens normally would have been running around in the back yard, but that day were still cooped up). I think the dogs belong to someone who lives about half a mile away......so they were a long way from home. Dogs in the country do that. I was hoping they might tangle with the electric fence I have out back waiting for them, but they never got that far. They moved on to the next house. Haven't seen them since.
Short of shooting one, another option if you have some resources is to trap and hold them. That would work for curious dogs who keep coming around. An effective form of a live trap or box trap can be made from a dog kennel. Trap and hold them. If they matter, sooner or later the owner will come around to claim them and when he does, it will be him on the hot seat trying to explain why his dogs are on your place and what is he going to do about it. What complicates the situation and motivates some people is who got there first. If they were living there when you moved in and their dogs have been allowed to run free, they feel they have some type of roaming rights "grandfathered" in. Or just as bad are the newcomers who bring their dogs and cut em loose, thinking that is what dogs get to do in the country and seem to get bent out of shape when they find out otherwise.
S-Hen.......one additional piece of advice is to modify the fence where those dogs are shown to include a single hot electric wire on top of it. If they decide to try to climb that fence, they get zapped and zapped hard. As it is now, you have nothing preemptive to keep them on the outside where they belong. Better to get ahead of the curve now than deal with things after.
I remember when I was a kid living in a suburb of Atlanta, roaming male dogs were killing a shrub next to our mailbox. My dad put a hot wire in the bush and yelping was heard all over the county several times (different dogs, obviously, or one very stupid one, LOL). That fence is pretty far back from the house, surrounds over 2 acres, not sure how to hotwire it. They can go over in all sorts of places and we can't keep it clean of growth so not sure it would ever work.
We've been here going on 15 years now, had chickens for about 11 of those years. We have never lost a chicken to a dog (or any other predator) and hope to keep that record clean, though with all the wild predators we have here and the free ranging they do periodically, my number may be up at some point, I realize. But wild predators to me are different than domestic dogs who should never be free to roam onto anyone else's property. Wild predators are trying to eat. Dogs just kill for sport. Plus, of course, we have little control over the wild predators other than being sure the birds are locked up in a secure coop at night when most of them are hunting.
The county law has been reworded since the first time I read it, though it still says pretty much the same thing. The word "harassing" used to be in it. Now, it says "injured or damaged". But, if you read it as written now, it says you can kill a dog in defense of property, yourself or person or property of another from damage. Chickens are considered property, as is a dog. When would you defend a dead chicken? You defend LIVE chickens, right? So, taking it as it's written, I can kill a dog to defend my birds and keep them from being hurt/damaged/injured and it doesn't have to kill the chicken, as that woman said she read it. We know some folks have little reading comprehension or they just read it the way they want to.
I didn't see the dogs this a.m. If they were here, they were here before sunup. I was out earlier than normal, just in case. But, they may not come around for a couple of days because they got yelled at.
ETA: Read the case, very interesting!
Last edited: