#1: Appears to have good length to back, but lacks girth at the tail. Doesn't have dark glossy and waxy hackles/back/saddle feathers. Seems to be carrying wing a bit low.. Thanks. What I hoped for is kind of an evaluation of several of the better ones, and a list of obvious culls. I am hoping to learn from and to see what others see. I hope then to compare that to what I saw to help me learn what I am seeing and not seeing to evaluate my picks if that makes sense.
#2: Narrow, short back.
#3: Pinches in at tail, but not a bad looking bird.
#4: Fluff appears a bit orange.
#5: Not a bad looking bird.
#6: Black on hackles is on the edge of the feathers, instead of being edged in red.
#7: Narrow back. Little-to-no ticking in hackles. Poor feather condition.
#8: Appears to have good girth in back. Tail isn't overdone. Can't see ticking in hackles.
#9: Too many points on comb.
Based on what I can see, I think the best four are #3, #5, #8, and #9. Of course, this observation is only based on what I can see in the pictures... which rarely capture the the full essence of the birds. If any of these points are accurate, you should use them in your evaluation. You get to observe the birds in 3 dimensions, so some of the things (or everything) I mentioned may or may not be correct. It's ultimately up to you to decide which birds you think best represent the breed. Try not to over-complicate the situation... take out the worst birds and be comfortable with your decision(s)... and you'll do fine.