Why i do not want GMO in my food or my pets food

Status
Not open for further replies.
More misinformation, and nothing to back it up.
Accusations seem to be all anyone has to offer
Feel free to show these "studies"

I haven't seen you post any evidence, perhaps I missed it. Would you mind posting a couple of independently done studies that show positive results of consuming GMO foods? Here is some of the evidence you don't believe I have: http://earthopensource.org/index.php/reports/58 Link to the report itself is included in this short article. A feeding study done using GMO maize: http://www.biolsci.org/v05p0706.htm This one also speaks as to why the previously done studies were insufficient: http://www.biolsci.org/v06p0590.htm
 
Quote:
Quote:
The IJBS study's author Gilles-Eric Séralini responded to the Monsanto statement on the blog, Food Freedom, "Our study contradicts Monsanto conclusions because Monsanto systematically neglects significant health effects in mammals that are different in males and females eating GMOs, or not proportional to the dose. This is a very serious mistake, dramatic for public health. This is the major conclusion revealed by our work, the only careful reanalysis of Monsanto crude statistical data."
Seralini did the flawed study about rat tumors.
He has no credibility

http://naturalsociety.com/sorry-monsanto-govt-admits-gm-bt-cotton-crops-fail-40-percent/

I already showed you the report that said the suicides had NO relation to GMO crops, and the crop FAILURES were due to drought
Repeating
the false studies won't make them true
 
Quote:
Most of what you linked to are the same one's already refuted.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/12/monsantos-gmo-corn-linked_n_420365.html

Seralini did the flawed study about rat tumors.
He has no credibility

http://naturalsociety.com/sorry-monsanto-govt-admits-gm-bt-cotton-crops-fail-40-percent/

I already showed you the report that said the suicides had NO relation to GMO crops, and the crop FAILURES were due to drought
Repeating
the false studies won't make them true
Really? Please show me the refuted links. Show me your link to the suicides please. Again, you either work for monsanto or are naive to what's going on.
 
After reading through these posts I am so glad to see that there are many of us out there who are opposed to GMO's in food. I have known about GMO's and there ill effects on us for a few years now. But going back a few years when I used to talk about GMO's no one had a clue as to what I was speaking about, and looked at me as if I was nuts.As more and more people are becoming aware of what is going on with our food supply and what companies like Monsanto are doing to our food, maybe things will start to change. Just because the ill effects from eating these foods aren't immediate doesn't mean there are none. I am thinking it will probably be years down the road before major ill effects are seen from consuming these foods. Then it will be to late.
sad.png
 
I've posted links that verify what I've said

From your link:
The SAME discredited "scientists" did all these reports,

And those links were...? Haven't seen them. How about this? http://www.enveurope.com/content/23/1/10 Or perhaps this; http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_18101.cfm This is also some interesting info on slightly different lines: http://naturalsociety.com/usda-steps-back-and-gives-monsanto-more-power-over/

ETA: I notice that you haven't said whether or not you actually grow/sell GMO products?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom