Search results for query: *

It doesn't work in reality. Though it has been tried, many times.

Oh no, the Vets are serving a public good, therefore, free veterinary care for our birds is a public Right. Of course food is a right too, so if the neighbor wants some fo the eggs from the chickens the vet is caring for for free, that's their right too. And we'll all do this - perfectly...

because "magic"??? How exactly do you propose to do such a thing?

Ultimately, your imagined neural network fails for a whole host of practical reasons, most of which have nothing to do with NPIP. Which, again, is NOT required for intrastate poultry sales. That those issues are not immediately obvious to you suggests you wish to impose a policy preference...

TSN (Tyson) Sock price, 1990 - 2004 S&P 500, same time scale. That's right, Tyson underperformed the market - substantially.

Should keep in mind also that TX is a local (or Home) rule State. Most of the ordinances restricting chickens ares at the local (City, sometimes County) level, not the State level. As to the rest of your speculation? Long on inference, short on proof. Once again, you appear to be mistaking...

NPIP is pretty clearly constitutional. Unsure where you got your law degree. Perhaps you should consider suing them for the poor quality of their product. While I have not looked at the specific structure of the TAHC, its general concept also fits easily wihin the traditional and...