- Jun 19, 2010
- 357
- 14
- 100
Dan, the mixing together of different lines of a breed in bad shape or where there hasn't been enough attention to even basics, much less details, is something that Craig Russell has always said the Dorkings respond to. That somehow some element of good is still in there waiting to be stirred up and out and segregated from the trash. I never did understand the idea that you have to outcross existing gene pools out of existence (at least on your own place) and create a hodge podge in order to have your own line. The hodge podge of ancestry pretty well negates the idea of that collection of birds and traits being a true family line anyways. Not everyone thinks in terms of families but if you want your fowl to have a certain look and to be reasonably consistent in their characteristics I know of no other way to do this except by working up a family of birds. Doesn't mean that there'd never be a strain cross but as Dan has said it needs to be done carefully. One breeder said with an eye dropper. There was an article by Vance Hammond in one of the APA Yearbooks, 1978 I think, (lost my own copy) where he outlined what he did with "blood" of different breeding and sort of created sub families within the broader context of the base strain. If I remember correctly they were female based.