And you were right. The article I linked for you was ignored, for whatever reason. Will a short quote from a different paper persuade you to stick with your original research findings?
"5.2.1.2. Dietary supplementation of feed additives. There are current efforts in the poultry industry to use natural antimicrobial agents, such as phytobiotics (herbs, plant extracts), prebiotics, probiotics and antimicrobial peptides to combat bacterial infections, modulate immune responses, and improve growth performance of broiler chickens without the use of antibiotics.5.2.1.2.1. Phytobiotics. These are plant-derived natural bioactive compounds that can be used as alternatives to antibiotics as growth promoters. It has been reported that early dietary herbal supplements enhance immune responses of broiler chickens by promoting splenic lymphocyte proliferation and modulating intestinal microbial populations. Addition of Ferulago angulata to diets increases serum antibody titers against influenza virus (Govahi et al., 2013), reduces the number of coliform bacteria in the ileum and cecum and increases the number of intestinal lactobacilli (Rostami et al., 2015). Similarly, early feeding of a polyherbal nutritional supplement is reported to increase antibody responses following vaccination against NDV and to improve gut function and morphogenesis, enhancing absorption and utilization of nutrients (Kadam et al., 2009)." Taha-Abdelaziz et.al. Effects of early feeding and dietary interventions on development of lymphoid organs and immune competence in neonatal chickens: A review
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2018.05.001