Quote:
I feel I must point out that the land needed to grow food to feed cows is much larger than what you need to feed a human. The amount of caloric energy (and land) lost by feeding the cow to then eat is very high. It's pretty inefficient (I admit it's definately very tasty, boy do I miss me some cheeseburgers
). Though I am a fan of Kingsolver, in her new book she states that eating local meats makes it environmentally okay. However, she misses the point that it isn't the transport of the meat that is the issue, but that animals with multiple stomaches (cows, sheep, etc., not chickens or pigs) put out huge amounts of methane, also known as cow farts
. That is where the real greenhouse gas issue is coming from with these animals, not the transport. Gross, but true. So though she is technically right with the quote you sited as well as the one in her newer book, it is overly simplistic and doesn't take into account the fact that all we can all hope to do is lessen our impact, it's not all or nothing.
As a side, I just picked up the book you quote on tape from the library today, and I'm really excited to listen to it while putzing with my weaving.
Human caused climate change is a complete fraud. It's been running out of steam fast since those "decimal point" errors where discovered in NASA data. We should really be concerned about the global cooling that is actually happening.
I am not going to get into a discussion about global climate change, the factual scientific research is out there and if people choose to ignore it than that is on them. People confuse climate and weather all the time. Look up the Academy of Sciences reports, there are also many more reports from the interntional scientific communities. If people choose to ignore the facts and cling onto the opinions of the very very very few dissentors that are propped up, then there is really nothing anyone can say to change that.