The finger measurements are only for comparisons between birds in a flock. If you evaluate 15 cockerels at 10 weeks old they obviously are going to be smaller (i.e. shorter backs) than if you evaluate 15 cockerels at 10 months old. Also, everyone's fingers are different widths and where you start and finish makes a difference, so you can't compare your cockerel with someone else's if you both are measuring in finger widths. 
The breed standards will NEVER list measurements for short/medium/long. The exact measurement is trivial. What matters is the proportions and overall balance in the bird. That is why I developed my horizontal line test to establish the width of the neck as a unit of "1" and the back length in terms of less than the unit of "1" more than the unit of "1" or twice the unit of "1", etc. The fatter the neck of the cockerel the longer the back needs to be to maintain the proportions and the thinner the neck the shorter the back needs to be to maintain proportions. Shoot for a back at least as long as the width of the neck. Twice as long is better.
Yes, the serrations of the points of the comb on the gold cockerel look really good. The good cockerels I have seen tend to have the first few points about perfect with the last two points too thin. The thin last two points is a very strong trait of the USA Legbars lines.
Note: The English Standard list that combs of the Cockerel with the blade that bends forward is a severe defect. So bent combs should be woked away from where possible. It is usually best to pair a cockerel with a bent or overgrown comb with a hen with a very small comb.

The breed standards will NEVER list measurements for short/medium/long. The exact measurement is trivial. What matters is the proportions and overall balance in the bird. That is why I developed my horizontal line test to establish the width of the neck as a unit of "1" and the back length in terms of less than the unit of "1" more than the unit of "1" or twice the unit of "1", etc. The fatter the neck of the cockerel the longer the back needs to be to maintain the proportions and the thinner the neck the shorter the back needs to be to maintain proportions. Shoot for a back at least as long as the width of the neck. Twice as long is better.
Yes, the serrations of the points of the comb on the gold cockerel look really good. The good cockerels I have seen tend to have the first few points about perfect with the last two points too thin. The thin last two points is a very strong trait of the USA Legbars lines.
Note: The English Standard list that combs of the Cockerel with the blade that bends forward is a severe defect. So bent combs should be woked away from where possible. It is usually best to pair a cockerel with a bent or overgrown comb with a hen with a very small comb.
Last edited: