May 10, 2012 #1 Breshcandra Songster 9 Years Mar 11, 2010 1,044 4 151 Granite Falls, WA Number 1 Number 2 I thought Number 1 was the male because of how thick the legs were. Here are the legs for number 1 Edited by Breshcandra - Today at 7:56 am
Number 1 Number 2 I thought Number 1 was the male because of how thick the legs were. Here are the legs for number 1 Edited by Breshcandra - Today at 7:56 am
May 10, 2012 #2 BlueCamas Songster 8 Years Aug 25, 2011 2,198 43 171 Milwaukie, Oregon They both look boyish to me, but it's really hard to tell from those pictures. Head shots would help a lot.
They both look boyish to me, but it's really hard to tell from those pictures. Head shots would help a lot.
May 10, 2012 Thread starter #3 Breshcandra Songster 9 Years Mar 11, 2010 1,044 4 151 Granite Falls, WA Number 2 Number 1
May 10, 2012 #4 BlueCamas Songster 8 Years Aug 25, 2011 2,198 43 171 Milwaukie, Oregon I'm going to stick with saying they are cockerels, hopefully others will chime in.