The important thing is not where a copy can be found in a digital library, but the quality of itscontentions, testing methodologies and conclusions - and, to some extent, the quality of the place where it was published (as a suggestor of quality). Here, that's the JBPC. Review of the titles of their articles over the last several years suggests they have no particular area of specialization (and thus no robust peer review process comprised of persons with specialized expertise in the field), and a rather "loose" standard of acceptance.
Some samples:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/50353499_Do_We_Need_a_Scientific_Revolution
https://www.researchgate.net/public...l_poisoning_and_prevention_of_Covid-19_spread
https://www.researchgate.net/public...ic_Credibility_in_Research_and_Implementation
https://www.researchgate.net/public...quences_of_ignorance_about_aerotoxic_syndrome
(and a few years later)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277887304_Is_there_such_a_thing_as_aerotoxic_syndrome
(for a few years, the journal appears to have fixated on articles about aircraft cabin air quality and pilots)
Obviously, they've also published articles about more distinct, measurable, testable mechanical, biological, and physical processes - but in this case, I think the article needs to stand or fall on its own merits, rather than rely on the credibility of its publisher - and while its long on plausible sounding theories, none have been tested. I look forward to the follow up research.
Some samples:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/50353499_Do_We_Need_a_Scientific_Revolution
https://www.researchgate.net/public...l_poisoning_and_prevention_of_Covid-19_spread
https://www.researchgate.net/public...ic_Credibility_in_Research_and_Implementation
https://www.researchgate.net/public...quences_of_ignorance_about_aerotoxic_syndrome
(and a few years later)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277887304_Is_there_such_a_thing_as_aerotoxic_syndrome
(for a few years, the journal appears to have fixated on articles about aircraft cabin air quality and pilots)
Obviously, they've also published articles about more distinct, measurable, testable mechanical, biological, and physical processes - but in this case, I think the article needs to stand or fall on its own merits, rather than rely on the credibility of its publisher - and while its long on plausible sounding theories, none have been tested. I look forward to the follow up research.