Quote:
They invented Maoism.
I know, I know, that wasn't exactly what you were thinking...
Actually they have good aquaculture systems for double-cropping fish in the rice paddies. Yes, the intellectual property goes with the companies that are bought, but they also have very good electrical engineers of their own, and I think their modern architects are far superior to ours. Seriously, if they want to trade Frank Gehry for IM Pei or Arup, I'd consider that we got a better deal. They have most excellent civil engineers, too.
A lot of modern science and engineering is Chinese, either Chinese people coming here to study and work or else done in China: drug discovery, agriculture, textile development, building materials, lots of applied sciences. A big part of that is money, but by no means ALL of it is about the money--Chinese educational systems are far superior to American schools when it comes to math and science. Since most engineers and scientists are the inventors and discoverers, and you need math to do that sort of thing, it makes sense that schools with strong math classes would produce more inventors.
I would worry less about IP loss than about the debt aspect of it, really. Most of the patents nowadays are for products that are manufactured overseas anyways--it's not like any of those profits stay here, they are funding jobs in India and China. Companies that have headquarters in the US often have no more than a "shell" presence, some offices for executives and administrators, while the majority of jobs and investment is overseas. It's been that way for a while now.
Money goes out, it doesn't come back, then we take on debt from their banks so that we don't have any political leverage to address the trade deficits...