Well, It's pretty well understood that interfering with the circadian rhythms of animals interferes with their physiology negatively.
(and asking for "written evidence" to support that just smacks a little of snarkyness to me, though perhaps i misread it.) Immunity is usually the first to suffer--for instance humans with irregular or inadequate sleep patterns do tend to have higher likelihood of health problems, acute and chronic. the fact that the effects are quite subtle doesn't make them not real. and waiting for overwhelming materialistic evidence that something is definitively harmful is often not necessary or wise when there is reasonable indirect evidence suggesting it may not be optimal, particularly when alternatives exist.
But, perhaps "inhumane" was a bit strong a word to use on my part--perhaps i fell victim to hyperbole in trying to make a point. (though in my mind, deliberating choosing to do things that have negative impact on the quality of life of an animal when alternatives exist is by definition inhumane.)
But it is also noticed that you made no attempt to refute the general thesis, if you will, namely that interfering with biological processes rather than working with them is sometimes counterproductive, nor did you acknowledge the fact that--importantly!--
there are other ways to help achieve more consistent winter laying in cold places, aside from using artificial lighting.
However, I'm not really interested in splitting hairs over who's views are more scientifically sound or playing "gotcha." Nor was I trying to say other's opinions and experience aren't valid. I was just trying to round out the discussion a bit and contribute.
Thanks for the opportunity to do so! And best of luck to the OP